PSI - Issue 2_B

R.Citarella et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 2 (2016) 2706–2717 Author n me / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000

2716

11

Figure 17. Numerical-experimental crack shape comparison for the specimen undergoing tension/torsion loads.

1100

20 40 60

1000

‐80 ‐60 ‐40 ‐20 0

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

900

KII [MPa*mm^0.5]

Step 0

Step 5

Step 10

800

Crack front [‐]

‐150 ‐100 ‐50 0 50 100

700

KIII [MPa*mm^0.5]

600

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Step 0

Step 5

Step 10

500

KIII [MPa*mm^0.5]

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Step 0

Step 5

Step 10

Position

Crack front [‐]

Figure 18. SIF values during growth for the configuration undergoing tension/torsion loads.