PSI - Issue 2_B
B. Fedelich et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 2 (2016) 2190–2197 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000
2195
6
2 E HCF eff cyc
aY
2
,
(5)
HCF CTOD d
'
n
where HCF eff denotes the effective stress range, that is the range of the stress in excess of the opening stress op . The cyclic yield stress is denoted by cyc , ' n d is a function of the cyclic hardening exponent ' n (see Shih, 1981), Y is a geometric factor and E the Young's modulus. It is assumed that the HCF loading becomes only effective when HCF CTOD overruns the threshold th CTOD . The critical crack depth can be expressed as function of this threshold as
cyc E CTOD
Y
1
th
.
(6)
a
th
d
2
HCF
'
n
eff
HCF CTOD can also
Since the temperature and the effective stress range can change during the cycle, the value
HCF CTOD during a TMF+HCF block is regarded as
change during a TMF block. The maximal value attained by being critical for the impact of the HCF vibrations. Thus we consider
2
E
HCF eff
(7)
Sup
Sup
,
HCF CTOD aY
d
a
2
HCF
'
n
eff
HCF Cycles
HCF Cycles
cyc
where
2
E
HCF eff
.
(8)
Sup
2 Y d
HCF eff
'
n
HCF Cycles
cyc
From equ. (4) to (8) finally result the following estimate for the lifetime reduction
TMF HCF TMF N N factor:
, CTOD N a th
TMF HCF
If
1,
HCF eff
N
TMF
f
0 CTOD a HCF eff
Log
th
CTOD
CTOD N
TMF HCF
(9)
If
,
,
th
th
HCF eff
0 f a a
a
a
N
TMF
0
f
Log
, CTOD N a th
TMF HCF
If
0.
HCF eff
N
TMF
0
In the present work, various solutions for the crack opening stress op have been tested. It was found that taking the whole stress range i.e. HCF HCF eff yielded the best results in terms of the correlation , HCF TMF HCF TMF eff N N . In other words, we set
2
E
HCF
.
(10)
Sup
,
2 Y d
HCF HCF
max HCF HCF
min HCF
'
eff
n
HCF Cycles
cyc
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software