PSI - Issue 2_B
G. La Rosa et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 2 (2016) 2140–2147 G. La Rosa et al./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2016) 000 – 000
2146
7
294
298
Temp. [K]
Temp. [K]
293,5
297,5
293
297
296,5
292,5
Time [s]
Time [s]
296
292
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
PF
PM PB
PL
PF
PB
PL
PM
291,6 291,8 292 292,2 292,4 292,6 292,8
Temp. [K]
Fig. 7. Temperature value in the four points of Fig. 6. Top left: specimen with 8 mm hole. Top right: specimen with 5.5 mm hole. Bottom left: specimen with 4 mm hole.
Time [s]
0
100
200
300
PF
PM
PB
PL
Table 5 reports the mean values, together with the ratio between the nominal cross area A 0 and the net one A.
Table 5: Mean ratios between the temperature differences at the measuring points. Hole [mm] ( ) ( ) ( ) 2,386 1,391 1,576 8
( ) 3,373
A 0 /A
24/16 = 1.5 24/18.5 = 1.3 24/20 = 1.2
5,5
2,046 1,736
1,317 1,240
1,354 1,259
2,656 2,084
4
It is possible to highlight that the ratios T PB / T PL are very close to the ratios A 0 /A, demonstrating that, in the point PB at the border, the stress concentration due to the hole presence is almost negligible. Then, the ratios referred to the point PL can be considered as notch effect related to the nominal area A 0 , while those referred to the point PB represent the notch effect related to the net cross area A. Finally, the mean ratios of the thermal variations for the correlated (dynamic) and uncorrelated (static) curves were shown (Table 6) with the mean ratios of the strain measured by D.I.C. in the points PF, PM, PB e PL (Table 7).
Table 6. Mean ratios of the thermal variations for the correlated (dynamic) and uncorrelated (static) curves.
(
)
( )
( )
( )
Hole [mm]
Correlated Curve
Uncorrelated Curve
Correlated Curve
Uncorrelated Curve
Correlated Curve
Uncorrelated Curve
Correlated Curve
Uncorrelated Curve
8
2,386 2,046 1,736
2,045 1,791 1,308
1,391 1,317 1,240
1,32
1,576 1,354 1,259
1,525 1,319 1,247
3,373 2,656 2,084
2,651 2,187 1,474
5,5
1,278 1,206
4
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software