PSI - Issue 2_B

Jozef Kšiňan et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 2 (2016) 197 – 204 Jozef Kší ň an, Roman Vodi č ka / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000

203

7

Fig. 5. Distributions of the stresses s n t t , , damage parameter  (left) and the evolution of interface debonding (right) for the fibre No. 4, for all of the models at the time step 120  k .

Fig. 6. Evolution of the deformed shapes, at the scale of the fibers multiplied by a factor of five, corresponding to the four different load steps for the CIM model with friction coefficient 1   .