PSI - Issue 2_A

Uğur Yolum et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 2 (2016) 3713 – 3720 Yolum et al./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2016) 000–000

3720

8

CT specimens with and without holes are analyzed using PDIFEA. The solutions of CT specimens are validated by comparing load vs CMOD curves with the ones from literature. Based on CT results, it can be concluded that holes behind the crack tip reduces the load carrying capacity of the specimens. It can also be noted that, holes in front of the crack tip has no influence on the load carrying capacity by comparing CT specimens with 4 and 8 holes. Based on those results, it can be indicated that PDIFEA with proposed constitutive two-dimensional is capable of capturing ductile damage in CT. PDIFEA approach is also validated with the results in the open literature. Acknowledgement This research is supported by TÜBİTAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey), under award MAG 112M891. The authors also would like to thank Dr. E. Madenci of University of Arizona and Dr. E. Oterkus of Universty of Stratchlyde for their contribution to this study. References Belytschko, T., Black, T., 1999. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 45, 601–620. Dipasquale, D., Zaccariotto, M., Galvanetto, U., 2014. Crack propagation with adaptive grid refinement in 2D peridynamics. Int. J. Fract. 190, 1–22. DS Simulia, 2012. Abaqus CAE User’s Manual (6.12) 1174. Gerstle, W., Sau, N., Silling, S., 2007. Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nucl. Eng. Des. 237, 1250–1258. Gerstle, W., Sau, N., Silling, S. a, 2005. Peridynamic Modeling of Plain and Reinforced Concrete Structures. 18th Int. Conf. Struct. Mech. React. Technol. (SMiRT 18) 1–15. Griffith, A.A., 1921. The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. Ha, Y.D., Bobaru, F., 2010. Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics. Int. J. Fract. 162, 229–244. Hu, W., Ha, Y.D., Bobaru, F., 2012. Peridynamic model for dynamic fracture in unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 217-220, 247–261. Hu, W., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Yen, C.F., Bobaru, F., 2013. Impact damage on a thin glass plate with a thin polycarbonate backing. Int. J. Impact Eng. 62, 152–165. Kumar, S., Singh, I.V., Mishra, B.K., 2014. A coupled finite element and element-free Galerkin approach for the simulation of stable crack growth in ductile materials. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 70, 49–58. Lee, J., Liu, W., Hong, J.-W., 2015. Impact fracture analysis enhanced by contact of peridynamic and finite element formulations. Int. J. Impact Eng. 1–12. Liu, W., Hong, J.W., 2012. Discretized peridynamics for brittle and ductile solids. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 89, 1028–1046. Macek, R.W., Silling, S.A., 2007. Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 43, 1169–1178. Madenci, E., Oterkus, E., 2014. Peridynamic theory and its applications. Madenci, E., Oterkus, S., 2016. Ordinary state-based peridynamics for plastic deformation according to von Mises yield criteria with isotropic hardening. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 86, 192–219. Melenk, J.M., Babuška, I., 1996. The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. Oterkus, E., Barut, A., Madenci, E., 2012a. Peridynamics Based on Principle of Virtual Work, in: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. pp. 1–25. Oterkus, E., Madenci, E., 2012a. Peridynamic analysis of fiber-reinforced composite materials. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. Oterkus, E., Madenci, E., 2012b. Peridynamics for Failure Prediction in Composites, in: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. pp. 1–32. Oterkus, E., Madenci, E., Weckner, O., Silling, S., Bogert, P., Tessler, A., 2012b. Combined finite element and peridynamic analyses for predicting failure in a stiffened composite curved panel with a central slot. Compos. Struct. 94, 839–850. Rice, J.R., 1968. The elastic-plastic mechanics of crack extension. Int. J. Fract. Mech. 4, 41–47. Seleson, P., Parks, M.L., Gunzburger, M., Lehoucq, R.B., 2009. Peridynamics as an Upscaling of Molecular Dynamics. Multiscale Model. Simul. Silling, S.A., 2000. Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. Silling, S.A., Askari, E., 2005. A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics, in: Computers and Structures. pp. 1526– 1535. Silling, S.A., Bobaru, F., 2005. Peridynamic modeling of membranes and fibers. Int. J. Non. Linear. Mech. 40, 395–409. Silling, S.A., Epton, M., Weckner, O., Xu, J., Askari, E., 2007. Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J. Elast. 88, 151–184. Silling, S.A., Lehoucq, R.B., 2008. Convergence of peridynamics to classical elasticity theory. J. Elast. 93, 13–37. Song, J.-H., Wang, H., Belytschko, T., 2007. A comparative study on finite element methods for dynamic fracture. Comput. Mech. 42, 239–250. Taylor, M., Steigmann, D.J., 2013. A two-dimensional peridynamic model for thin plates. Math. Mech. Solids 15–16. Weng, T.., Sun, C.., 2000. A study of fracture criteria for ductile materials. Eng. Fail. Anal. 7, 101–125. Wu, C.T., Ren, B., 2015. A stabilized non-ordinary state-based peridynamics for the nonlocal ductile material failure analysis in metal machining process. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 291, 197–215.

Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease