PSI - Issue 19
Giovanni M. Teixeira et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 19 (2019) 175–193 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000
178
4
Fig. 2. Structural Stresses from nodal forces and moments.
Equation 4 needs to be evaluated six times, replacing the F’s and f’s for the forces and moments at the three orthogonal directions x, y and z. From the local forces and moments Equations 1-3 provides the three structural stresses that are used to compose the effective structural stress range according to Equation 5.
l
l
0 0 0 0
1
1
1 1 2 l l l 3 6
1 2 f f f 3 n M M f
1 2 F F F
l
M M
0
2
6 3 6
(4)
2 3 3 l l l
l
0
3
2
n F M M
6 3 6
M M
O M
n 1 n 1 6 3 O M l
l
0 0 0 0
2 s e 3 2 s 2 z
(5)
The recommendation (Hong et al. (2014)) is that if the shear structural stress ranges are smaller than 1/3 of the normal structural stress ranges they can be ignored, which yields in the Equation 6 below:
s e
(6)
At this point a fracture mechanics based equivalent structural stress parameter can be presented by normalizing the above structural stress range Δ σ s , taking the plate thickness t and r ratio into account:
t I r
s S
(7)
s
2 m 1 2m m
The I(r) 1/m parameter is a dimensionless function of the ratio r and is presented in two expressions, depending on the loading conditions i.e., whether the structure is under load-controlled or displacement controlled conditions. Under load-controlled conditions I(r) 1/m becomes:
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker