PSI - Issue 18

Vladimír Chmelko et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 18 (2019) 600–607 Chmelko, V., Berta, I./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

607

8

Tab.2. Comparison of the burst pressures of pipes specimens with corrosion defects.

Specimen P experimental (MPa) P FEM (MPa) ASME B31G DNV-RP-F101 No.1 32.1 30 21.5 23.9 No.2 30.0 27 19.8 21.8 No.3 18.5 16.5 12.2 13.7

Fig. 6 The shape of the test specimen with corrosion defect and its model in FEM.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-17-0666 .

References

Chen W.F., Han D.J., Plasticity for Structural Engineers, Springer-Verlag New York 1998 ASME B31.G: Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, 2009. DNV RP F101-Parts A & B: Corroded Pipelines, 2004 (updated 2006) Cosham, Hopkins, 2003. The Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual (PDAM) ; Penspen Ltd. Nanney, S. 2012. Pipeline Safety Update. NAPCAWorkshop, Texas