PSI - Issue 17

Haya H. Mhanna et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 17 (2019) 214–221

219

Haya H. Mhanna et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

6

each beam, percent increase in mid-span deflection at ultimate load compared to the control specimens ( δ u ), and percent increase in mid-span deflection at failure load ( δ f ) compared to the control specimens are presented in Table 3.

Fig. 6. Failure of Tested Specimens. (a) CB; (b) CBR1; (c) CBR2; (d) BSU; (e) WBR1; (f) WBR2

100 150 200 250 300 350 400

CB BSU CBR1 WBR1 CBR2 WBR2

Load (kN)

0 50

0

10

20

30

40

Displacement (mm)

Fig.7. Mid-span Load-Displacement Curves

Table 3. Results Summary Beam P u (kN)

δ u (mm)

δ f (mm) 4.22 10.07 6.08

ε frp (με)

% increase in P u

% increase in δ u

% increase in δ f

CB

148.30 318.58 101.00

3.85 8.70 5.43

-

-

-

-

BSU CBR1

2847.33

114.82

125.75

138.80

-

-

-

-