PSI - Issue 14
Ilyin A.V. et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 14 (2019) 964–977 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2018) 000 – 000
976
13
m
7 10
Rb
N
.
(17)
i
K
ef
For example, for loading in seawater without protection, for MPa 148 for MPa 94 18 Rb r
r
3,
i
(18a)
r
3,
i
Rb
Rb 3.21 lg 4
m
.
(18b)
K ef is obtained as a product K ef = K s K eq , where K eq is a function of K w and r . The calculated data are well described by the formula Q eq K K w , (19) here Q varies from 1 at high cyclic asymmetry to 0 at fully compressive loading cycle that physically corresponds to the transition of propagating fracture from WTZ into base metal. The calculation has allowed finding an approximating function i i i r r arctg Q r 1 (1 ) . (20) The procedure of N c assessment is grounded on the integration of the formula (10) with substituted experimentally found parameters, formula (11). In this case the cyclic asymmetry factor r c in general different from r is calculated from the formulae
IR Ires Ires IR K K K K K
r
for tensile design stress,
(21a)
c
Id
IR K K r K K K c Ires
Id
for compressive design stress.
(21b)
Ires
IR
Figure 8 – Dependences N c vs. for welded joints of 20 to 70 mm thickness with a symmetric X or K-type groove, fracture nucleates from a WTZ concentrator. 1. S 60 mm, σ R = 0, r = - . 2. S 60 mm, σ R = 200 MPa, r = - . 3. S 60 mm, σ R = 350 MPa, r = - or σ R = 0, r = 0. 4. 20 S 70 mm, σ R = 350 MPa, r = 0.
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker