PSI - Issue 13
Koji Uenishi et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 13 (2018) 652–657 Uenishi et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2018) 000 – 000
656
5
a
Stemming material ejected later by gas pressurization
Cracks in these rectangular areas emerge first
Main crack
Blast holes
Dummy holes
Widening of curved main crack
50 mm
b
Cracks in the rectangular areas
Blast holes
Stemming material ejected
Desired main crack being widened
Desired main crack
50 mm
Fig. 2. Fracture development in the specimens (top view) for the cases (a) IC-09/00 and (b) IC-10/00, recorded by the high-speed digital video camera at a frame rate of 50,000 frames/s. The initial grid spacing is 50 mm, and the time elapsed after the leftmost photograph is (a) 200, 600 and 1,800 s, and (b) 100, 200 and 1,000 s, respectively. Although a fracture criterion should be included for the analyses of the post-failure phase (technically already implemented in our numerical code) and for instance, experimentally observed dynamic fracture in a reinforced concrete beam by conventional, overcharge blasting can be well simulated utilizing the code with e.g. the maximum principal tensile stress fracture criterion (Uenishi et al., 2010), we must always keep in mind that our knowledge on real three dimensional dynamic phenomena and fracture criteria for moderate (non-overcharge) blasting (by detonating explosives or applying EDI) is still limited. Most of the widely employed fracture criteria have been derived from one- (or at most
Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease