PSI - Issue 13

Ahmed Sohail et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 13 (2018) 1014–1019 Author name / StructuralIntegrity Procedia 00 (2018) 000 – 000

1019

6

strengths, as expected, was observed for the hybrid material. Hybridization, by adding Kevlar to an existing carbon composite, knocks down the elastic stiffness and strength but there is negligible change was observed for failure strain. Overall, numerical model developed in this study provided relatively accurate estimation of the tensile properties of non-hybrid and hybrid 3D woven composites. Failure criteria used here can be used to obtain accurate strength properties as well. The approach presented here can be used to understand and quantify the effects of hybridization and fiber architecture on the tensile response of 3D woven composites. Bogdanovich, A.E., 2006. Multi-scale modeling, stress and failure analyses of 3-D woven composites. Journal of Materials Science, 41(20), pp.6547-6590. Bogdanovich, A.E., Karahan, M., Lomov, S.V. and Verpoest, I., 2013. Quasi-static tensile behavior and damage of carbon/epoxy composite reinforced with 3D non-crimp orthogonal woven fabric. Mechanics of Materials, 62, pp.14-31. Dai, S. and Cunningham, P.R., 2016. Multi-scale damage modelling of 3D woven composites under uni-axial tension. Composite Structures, 142, pp.298-312. Huang, Z.M., 2001. Micromechanical prediction of ultimate strength of transversely isotropic fibrous composites. International journal of solids and structures, 38(22-23), pp.4147-4172. Ivanov, D.S., Lomov, S.V., Bogdanovich, A.E., Karahan, M. and Verpoest, I., 2009. A comparative study of tensile properties of non-crimp 3D orthogonal weave and multi-layer plain weave E-glass composites. Part 2: Comprehensive experimental results. Composites part a: applied science and manufacturing, 40(8), pp.1144-1157. Karahan, M., Lomov, S.V., Bogdanovich, A.E., Mungalov, D. and Verpoest, I., 2010. Internal geometry evaluation of non-crimp 3D orthogonal woven carbon fabric composite. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41(9), pp.1301-1311. Lomov, S.V., Bogdanovich, A.E., Ivanov, D.S., Mungalov, D., Karahan, M. and Verpoest, I., 2009. A comparative study of tensile properties of non-crimp 3D orthogonal weave and multi-layer plain weave E-glass composites. Part 1: Materials, methods and principal results. Composites part a: applied science and manufacturing, 40(8), pp.1134-1143. Muñoz, R., Martínez, V., Sket, F., González, C. and LLorca, J., 2014. Mechanical behavior and failure micromechanisms of hybrid 3D woven composites in tension. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 59, pp.93-104. Naik, N.K., Azad, S.N., Prasad, P.D. and Thuruthimattam, B.J., 2001. Stress and failure analysis of 3D orthogonal interlock woven composites. Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, 20(17), pp.1485-1523 Pankow, M., Yen, C.F., Rudolph, M., Justusson, B., Zhang, D. and Waas, A., 2012, April. Experimental investigation on the deformation response of hybrid 3D woven composites. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA (p. 1572). Stig, F. and Hallström, S., 2009. Assessment of the mechanical properties of a new 3D woven fibre composite material. Composites Science and Technology, 69(11-12), pp.1686-1692. Stobbe D, Mohamed M., 2003. 3D woven composites: cost and performance viability in commercial applications. in: 48th international SAMPE symposium. Tan P, Tong L, Steven GP, Ishikawa T., 2000a. Behavior of 3D orthogonal woven CFRP composites. Part I. FEA and analytical modeling approaches. Composites Part A; 31(3): pp 259-271. Tan, P., Tong, L. and Steven, G.P., 2000b. Behavior of 3D orthogonal woven CFRP composites. Part II. FEA and analytical modeling approaches. Composites Part A: applied science and manufacturing, 31(3), pp.273-281. Wang S, Zahlan N, Suemasu H., 1985 Compressive stability of delaminated random short-fiber composites, Part II-experimental and analytical results. J Compos Mater 19,317 – 33. References