PSI - Issue 11

Marco Tanganelli et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 11 (2018) 266–273 Tanganelli et al./ Public housing in Florence: seismic assessment of masonry buildings 00 (2018) 000 – 000

269

4

assuming a cracked behavior of the masonry. E m , therefore, has been assumed equal to 1500 MPa and 1200 MPa, respectively, for the two masonry types. In Table 1 the main information of each model is listed. The quantities listed in Table 1 are, respectively, the total number of storeys, the direction of the floors disposition, the total length (x) and depth (y) of each block, together with their ratio ( x/y ) and the ratio between the resistant area of the masonry walls in the two main directions ( A x , A y ) and the area of the buildings plan (A). case-study #1 case-study #2 case-study #3

case-study #4

case-study #5

case-study #6

case-study #7

case-study #8

case-study #9

case-study #10

case-study #11

Masonry A Masonry B Fig. 3. Plans of the 11 case-studies. Table 1. Main information regarding the considered case-studies.

x (m)

y (m)

x/y

A res, x /A

A res, y /A

case-study

Number of storeys

Floors disposition

case-study #1 case-study #2 case-study #3 case-study #4 case-study #5 case-study #6 case-study #7 case-study #8 case-study #9 case-study #10 case-study #11

3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6

transverse longitudinal crossed crossed crossed crossed crossed crossed crossed crossed transverse

20.50 21.80 21.50 38.70 15.25 21.50 63.60 23.00 16.85 19.60 19.15

10.1 10.5 11.7 11.7 11.8 10.6 10.6 9.8 10.5 13.1 11.9

2.03 2.08 1.84 3.31 1.29 2.03 6.00 2.35 1.60 1.50 1.61

8.5% 5.9% 8.0% 7.8% 4.9% 9.0% 8.9% 7.5% 8.1% 5.4% 6.1%

9.7% 8.4% 6.8% 6.2% 8.1% 7.3% 6.1% 8.3% 6.8% 7.6% 6.3%