PSI - Issue 11

J.I. Gisbert et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 11 (2018) 428–435

429

2

Author name

/ Structural Integ

rity Procedia 00

(2018) 000–000

1. I

ntroduction

enclature

Nom f ck f t κ cm κ cm Ω ci Ω cr κ tr Ω tr f xt G f I τ max G f II ava 19th met T grea in m to b type T may is a beh I sam join T com Acc tech com M

Uniaxia Uniaxia Plastic s Ultimate Relative Residua Plastic s Residua Maximu Critical Maximu Critical

l Compressive l Tensile Stren train at uniax effective pla stress at onse l compressive train limit in l tensile relati m Normal Co Fracture Ener m Equivalent Fracture Ener been one of raw material dually develo ctions, added ural masonry tures may be nded with m smit stresses. e characterist of elastic m sonry failure e, since it inv mple, which fine masonry any stress typ een mortar an have been m ith analytica the literature ed on repres ately with the

Strength gth

ial compressiv stic strain in c t of nonlinear relative stres tension ve stress ntact Stress gy for Norma Tangential C gy for Tangen the most use s in the natur ped into a m to the heritag buildings wh understood a ortar, which These structu ics of the mor odulus and th over the wea olves the sim largely depen ’s properties a es: piece cru d piece, joint ainly devel l methods an , these mod enting mason ir own charac

e strength ompression hardening s

l Separation ontact Stress tial Slip d building m al environme ostly brick b e and traditio ich are highly s a composite oversees the m res behave qu tar, and the sh e maximum c kest areas. Ac ulation of sev ds on the bou nd its failure shing under c sliding due to oped using e d numerical els can be a ry as a hom teristics.

M asonry has ilability of its century gra hods. hese constru t set of struct asonry struc ost cases bou e able to tran of pieces, th he difference cause the ma complex issu avior of the sa n order to de ples under m t failure betw hese studies plemented w ording with nique is bas ponent separ

aterials thro nt. This build ased constru nal buildings vulnerable to material whi asonry’s coh ite different ape adopted ompression a cording to th eral element ndary conditi modes, seve ompressive s shear forces xperimental models to be pproached fr ogeneous ma

ughout histor ing tradition, ction procedu that have sur earthquakes ch involves th esion, gener depending on by the assemb nd tension st is, simulation s with differe ons as well as ral authors lik tress, piece cr , and mixed fa samples cam able to ana om two diffe terial, while

y due to its which used m re due to ne vived until no . e assembling ating geometr the kind of s ling. resses betwee s and calculus nt. This gener the stress pla e [1]-[2]-[3] ack under fle ilures under m paigns which lyze general rent ways: ( (ii) micromo

durability, an ainly stone, w industriali wadays, gene of solid dry ic patterns in tresses to resi n pieces and of these stru ates an aniso ne. or [4] have s xural stress, t ultiaxial for , afterwards, masonry beh i) macromod dels consider

d the in the zation rate a pieces order st, the joints ctures tropic tudied ensile ces. were avior. elling each

Figure 1: E

lement solid65 (

left) and solid18

6 (right) [10]