PSI - Issue 11

P. Condoleo et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 11 (2018) 290–297

294

5

P. C

ondoleo and A.

Taliercio / Struct

ural Integrity Pr

ocedia 00 (2018)

000–000

D beha a

amage is lik vior of the bu

ely to be en ilding (as flo

hanced by th ors consist of

e geometrica simply suppo

l singularitie rted beams).

s recalled ab

ove, and the

limited box

-like

d

c

b

Fig. 6 Open 3. N 3.1. T (Fig the m

. (a) Preparation ing of the cracks umerical mo Geometrical m he numerical . 7). Plans of t odel, but rath

of the wall surf in the wall facin del odel of the f model was de he floors wer er taken into

ace to install the g the courtyard.

dial gauge. (b) M

easuring the cr

ack width. (c) In

ner and outer tem

perature vs. tim

e. (d)

armhouse veloped usin e available, to account as de

g AutoCAD a gether with e ad load

ccording to a levations and

n accurate su cross-section

rvey carried o s. The roof w

ut on the bui as not includ

lding ed in

Fig. 7. AutoCA

D model of the b

uilding (grey: m

asonry; red: woo

den beams; brow

n: steel beams).

3.2.

Materials and the absence the literature r elastic and s basically u elastic param tionable for m he software u rial densities

gravity load of experimen (NTC 2008 isotropic. Thi ndergo uniax eters are the asonry vault sed for the FE . In addition

s tal data, the e , UNI-EN 33 s assumption ial stress. Mas axial Young s (Anzani et a analyses (Ab to that, dead

In from linea beam key ques T mate

lastic proper 8, etc.) and ar is reasonable onry walls ar ’s modulus a l. 2010). aqus) autom loads taking

ties of the ma e listed in Ta not only for s e mainly subj nd Poisson’s atically comp the weight of

terials formin ble 1. All th teel and gran ected to in-pl ratio. The a utes gravity lo the ceilings

g the farmho e materials w ite, but also fo ane vertical s ssumption of ads accordin and the roof

use were ded ere assumed r wood, as ti tresses, so tha isotropy is g to the presc into account

uced to be mber t the more ribed were