Issue 47
D. Benasciutti et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 47 (2019) 348-366; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.47.26
with material type. In particular, the location of the most damaged point in the structure shifts in accordance to the degree by which material is sensitive to the hydrostatic stress value.
auto-PSDs
cross-PSDs
G G G
Re{G Re{G Re{G
}
xx
xx,yy
10 4
10 4
}
yy
xx,xy
}
10 2
10 2
xy
yy,xy
10 -2 stress PSD [(Pa 2 )/Hz] 10 0
10 -2 stress PSD [(Pa 2 )/Hz] 10 0
10 -4
10 -4
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
frequency, f [Hz]
frequency, f [Hz]
Figure 7 : Auto- and cross-PSD (one-sided) in a node close to the round notch.
A
C
.41E‐16 .18E‐04 .36E‐04 .54E‐04 .72E‐04 .90E‐04 .11E‐03 .13E‐03 .14E‐03 .16E‐03 .18E‐03 .20E‐03 .22E‐03 .23E‐03 .25E‐03 .27E‐03
‐16.38 ‐15.53 ‐14.68 ‐13.82 ‐12.97 ‐12.11 ‐11.26 ‐10.4 ‐9.55 ‐8.7 ‐7.84 ‐6.99 ‐6.13 ‐5.28 ‐4.42 ‐3.57
Material 1
D
B
.10E‐15 .82E‐04 .16E‐03 .25E‐03 .33E‐03 .41E‐03 .49E‐03 .57E‐03 .66E‐03 .74E‐03 .82E‐03 .90E‐03 .98E‐03 .11E‐02 .11E‐02 .12E‐02
‐15.99 ‐15.12 ‐14.25 ‐13.38 ‐12.51 ‐11.63 ‐10.76 ‐9.89 ‐9.02 ‐8.14 ‐7.27 ‐6.4 ‐5.53 ‐4.65 ‐3.78 ‐2.91
Material 2
(a)
(b)
Figure 8 : Comparison of damage maps for Material 1 vs. Material 2. Figs. (b) plots of log 10
(D) from Figs. (a) .
Indeed, in a FE model the stress ratio ρ ref
may vary over a range of values, which depend on the variation of the local
multiaxial state of stress among nodes. Fig. 9(a) illustrates the distribution of ρ ref
values obtained in numerical simulations.
This distribution holds for both materials, being ρ ref only a function of the local stress, not of material. The figure also marks the values at which the multiaxial stress is close to uniaxial tension or torsion, and the regions A, B, C, D identified in Fig. 8(a) (top). The values of ρ ref then measure if the stress in a point is more tension-like or torsion-like.
360
Made with FlippingBook Publishing Software