Issue34
Y. Sumi, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 34 (2015) 42-58; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.34.04
( ) ( ), h
( ) 1
(3)
1
Following the same method as used by Banichuk [1], Goldstein and Salganik [2, 3], and Cotterell and Rice [4], the perturbation solution of the stress field can be expressed by Muskhelishvili’s analytic functions [18] given by
Figure 2 : Coordinate systems for a kinked and curved crack.
2[ '( ) 22 11 12 z i 11 22 2
'( )], z
(4)
2[(
) ''( )
( ) z
z z z
'( )], z
where z = x 1 following form:
+ ix 2 . The analytic functions ( z ) and ( z ) are expanded in terms of ( 1
) up to the second order in the
3 ( ),
z O
'( ) z
0 ' ( ) z
1 ' ( ) z
2 ' ( )
(5)
3 ( ),
0 ( ) z ( ) z ( ) z O 1 2
( ) z
( z ) are of the zero-th order,
( z ) are of the first order, and
( z ) are of the
z and
z and
z and
in which
. The boundary conditions on the crack surfaces, at z = 1
+ i
become
second order in
2 '( ) Z z e (6) where is the angle of the slope on the crack line. It is assumed that the crack surfaces are subjected to normal and shear tractions T n and T s on the upper surface and - T n and - T s on the lower surface, respectively. We also assume that tractions on the crack surfaces, T n and T s are bounded and integrable in the defined range. Approximate Description of a Slightly Kinked and Curved Extension of a Straight Crack The second order approximation of the stress distribution in the vicinity of the original crack tip can be expressed by 1 2 3 ( , 0) ( , 0) ( , 0) ( ), 1 ,2 1 ,22 1 2 x x x O ij ij ij ij (7) in which I 1 ( , 0) ( ), 11 1 I 1 2 2 1 k x x T b O x x '( ) [( ) ''( ) ( ) z '( )] z ( ), i n s z z z T iT
k
x
I
1
( , 0) x
b
O x
(8)
( ),
22 1
I
1
2
2 1 x
k
x
II
1
( , 0) x
b
O x
( ),
12 1
II
1
2
2 1 x
where k I are also determined from the solution of the boundary-value problem prior to the crack extension. The surface tractions on the extended crack surfaces, T n and T s and k II are the stress intensity factors, and the coefficients T , b I , and b II
44
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator