PSI - Issue 83
Victor Rizov et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 83 (2026) 105–114
111
2 y M - bending moment; b - width of
The following notations are used in the above equations: N - axial force; i z 2 - distance of the upper surface of the layer from the centre. the beam;
The axial force and the bending moment are
z
1 up i n i z l l a
2 1 i
cos
sin
N
q
q
dz dx
,
(34)
2
1
Dxi
Dzi
2
i
cos
sin
sin
q z Dxi
1 q x l a Dxi
q z Dzi
2
2
z
1 up i n i z l l a
2 1 i
M
dz dx
,
(35)
2
2
1
y
cos
1 q x l a Dzi
2
i
where l is the length of the beam. The MatLab is applied to determine up and
n z 2 from Eqs. (32) and (33).
3 L J are found in a manner similar to that applied to obtain
1 L J . The solution of J is derived by
2 L J and
inserting of 3 L J in Eq. (22) (the MatLab is used for integration). The SERR in the beam is determined for control of the J -integral solution. The SERR, G , is 1 L J , 2 L J and
bda dU *
G
.
(36)
* U - complementary strain energy; a - length of the delamination.
The notations in Eq. (36) are:
The specific complementary strain energies, *
0 i u , are integrated in the layers of intact portion, 1 2 RR , of the
beam and the two arms of the delamination by the MatLab to obtain * U . The formula for * 0 i u is i i i i i d u * 0 .
(37)
* U is inserted in Eq. (36) to derive the SERR. The result thus obtained coincides with the J -integral, confirming the correctness of its solution. 3. Parametric study Here we focus on the analysis of the effects of different parameters of the moving beam structure on the J integral. These effects are illustrated by various graphs presented in dimensionless form in this section of the paper. The analysis is carried-out at: 0.600 l m, 0.450 a m, 0.012 b m, 0.018 h m, 4 n , 2 up n , 0.7 i , i z 2 60 , 1.800 and 1.045 . The first two parameters whose effect on the J -integral is investigated are the angle, , and the ratio, 2 1 / m m . The goal is to examine how the J -integral behaves when the inclination of the beam varies. The relationship, J integral - , is found at three 2 1 / m m ratios. These relationships are presented graphically in Fig. 3. The main conclusion which can be drawn from the graphs in Fig. 3 is that for the considered case the J -integral reaches
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs