PSI - Issue 80
Tafara E. Makuni et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 80 (2026) 105–116 Tafara E. Makuni / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000
115 11
Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge funding from the AVATAR project through the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) under Grant Agreement No. 101096073, and from United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) under the UK Government's Horizon Europe Guarantee scheme through Grant Agreement No. 10065739. References Abbott I. H. and Von Doenhoff A. E., 2012. Theory of wing sections: including a summary of airfoil data. Courier Corporation. Amiria A. K. and Bucher C., 2017. A procedure for in situ wind load reconstruction from structural response only based on field testing data. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics. Ao C. [et al.], 2023. Full-field dynamic strain reconstruction of an aero-engine blade from limited displacement responses. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering. Vol. 18, p. 15. Araujo-Estrada S.A. and Windsor S.P., 2021. Aerodynamic state and loads estimation using bioinspired distributed sensing. Journal of Aircraft. 2021. Vol. 58 (4), pp. 704-716. ATI Novanta, 2025. Delta/Gamma/Omega Force/Torque Sensor (https://ati.novanta.com/product/delta-gamma-omega-force-torque-sensor/#one novanta-single-product-all-features) [Online]. Balageas D. L., 2002. Proceedings of the First European Workshop. Structural Health Monitoring / ed. (ONERA) Department of Structures and Damage Mechanics French National Aerospace Research Establishment. Cachan, Paris: DEStech Publications. Bektas O., 2023. Visualising flight regimes using self-organising maps. The Aeronautical Journal. Cambridge University Press. Vol. 127 (1316) pp. 1817-1831. Bektas O., Papuga J. and Kubler S., 2024. Advancing Light Aircraft Health Monitoring with Flight Phase Clustering. Annual Conference of the PHM Society. Vol. 16 (1). Bui-Thanh T., Damodaran M. and Willcox K, 2004. Aerodynamic Data Reconstruction and Inverse Design Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition. AIAA Journal. Vol. 42 (8). Conlan-Smith C. [et al.], 2020. Aerodynamic shape optimization of aircraft wings using panel methods. AIAA Journal. Vol. 58 (9), pp. 3765 3776. Drela M., 2013. XFOIL 6.9 User Primer: Subsonic Airfoil Development System (https://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil) [Online]. Gudmundsson S., 2014. General Aviation Aircraft Design: Chapter 8 (The Anatomy of the Airfoil). Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014. ISBN 9780123973085, pp. 235-297. Hepperle M., 2017. JAVAFOIL User’s Guide (https://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/javafoil.htm) [Online]. Jones D. [et al.], 2020. Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology. Vol. 29, pp. 36-52. Kalsi H.S. and Tucker P.G., 2018, Numerical modelling of shock wave boundary layer interactions in aero-engine intakes at incidence. ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Kapteyn M.G. and Willcox K.E., 2004. From Physics-Based Models to Predictive Digital Twins via Interpretable Machine. Kapteyn M.G., Knezevic D.J. and Willcox K.E., 2020. Toward predictive digital twins via component-based reduced-order models and interpretable machine learning. AIAA Scitech Forum, p. 0418. Kapteyn M.G. [et al.], 2022. Data‐driven physics‐based digital twins via a library of component‐based reduced‐order models . International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. Vol. 123 (13), pp. 2986-300. Kapteyn M.G. and Willcox K.E., 2022. Design of Digital Twin Sensing Strategies Via Predictive Modeling and Interpretable Machine Learning. Journal of Mechanical Design. Vol. 144 (9). Makuni T.E. [et al.]. 2014. Transitional Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions in Intakes at Incidence. Symposium on Field of the Research Unit 1066. Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 323-333. Makuni T.E. [et al.], 2015. Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions in Subsonic Intakes at High Incidence. 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Maneth J., Wainwright B. and Harper P., 2016. Optimization of an Aircraft Wing. Design Informatics Lab: School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University. Raymer D., 2012. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. Renganathan S.A., Harada K. and Mavris D.N. Aerodynamic data fusion toward the digital twin paradigm, 2020. AIAA Journal. Vol. 58. (9), pp. 3902-18. Shkarayev S., Raman A. and Tessler A., 2002. Computational and Experimental Validation Enabling a Viable In-Flight Structural Health Monitoring Technology. Shkarayev S., Krashantisa R. and Tessler A., 2004. An inverse interpolation method utilizing in-flight strain measurements for determining loads and structural response of aerospace vehicles. Stieger H. J., 1932. Wing Construction. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society. Vol. 36 (262), pp. 789-827. Stinton D., 2001. The design of the airplane. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. Stratasys, 2018. PolyJet 3D Printers Systems and Materials. Rheinmünster, Germany.
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs