PSI - Issue 79

Manish Singh Rajput et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 79 (2026) 26–33

33

5. Conclusion Earlier crack initiation and failure are examined under thermo-mechanical cooling conditions because of the generation of tensile thermal strains. Delayed crack propagation and failure are observed under the right-edge heating condition with top-edge mechanical loading, as the applied thermal loading direction is perpendicular to the mechanical loading, resulting in compressive thermal strain due to the heating environment. The highest load bearing capacity of the CFRC structure is observed to be 420.66 N for the right edge cooling condition, in which the mechanical load is applied to the top edge and the thermal load is applied to the right edge of the specimen (CFRC structure). References 1. Arridge, R. “Fracture of Fiber Reinforced Materials,” Nature 223, 941 – 943 (1969). 2. L. P. Canal, C. González, J. Segurado, and J. LLorca, “Intraply fracture of fiber - reinforced composites: Microscopic mechanisms and modeling,” Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 1223 – 1232, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.008. 3. Z. Khan, B. F. Yousif, and M. Islam, “Fracture behaviour of bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 116, pp. 186 – 199, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.015. 4. M. Azadi, M. Saeedi, M. Mokhtarishirazabad, and P. Lopez- Crespo, “ Effects of loading rate on crack growth behavior in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites using digital image correlation technique,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 175, no. June, p. 107161, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107161. 5. C. Miao and H. V. T ippur, “Fracture behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: An optical study of loading rate effects,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 207, no. September 2018, pp. 203 – 221, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.035. 6. N. Ning, M. Wang, G. Zhou, Y. Qi u, and Y. Wei, “Effect of polymer nanoparticle morphology on fracture toughness enhancement of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 234, no. February, p. 109749, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb. 2022.109749. 7. Z. Liu and P. Li , “Effect of fiber orientation of adjacent plies on the mode I delamination fracture of carbon fiber reinforced polymer multidirectional laminates,” Polym. Compos., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 2560– 2572, 2025, doi: 10.1002/pc.29124. 8. S. S. Hosseini, H. Bayesteh, an d S. Mohammadi, “Thermo - mechanical XFEM crack propagation analysis of functionally graded materials,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 561, pp. 285 – 302, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.043. 9. J. C. Monge and J. L. Mantari, “Exact solution of thermo -mechanical analysis of laminated composite and sandwich doubly- curved shell,” Compos. Struct., vol. 245, no. December 2019, p. 112323, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112323. 10. T. Rabczuk, “Computational Methods for Fracture in Brittle and Quasi -Brittle Solids: State-of-the- Art Review and Future Perspectives,” ISRN Appl. Math., vol. 2013, pp. 1 – 38, 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/849231. 11. G. A. Francfort and J. Marigo, “Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 4 6, pp. 1319 – 1342, 1998. 12. C. Miehe, F. Welschinger, and M. Hofacker, “Thermodynamically consistent phase -field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi field FE implementations,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 83, pp. 1273– 1311, 2010, doi: 10.1002/nme.2861. 13. M . Ambati, T. Gerasimov, and L. De Lorenzis, “A review on phase - field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation,” Comput. Mech., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 383 – 405, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y. 14. J. Ye et al., “Failure analysis of fiber -reinforced composites subjected to coupled thermo- mechanical loading,” Compos. Struct., vol. 235, no. September 2019, p. 111756, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111756. 15. D. Kraus and V. Trappe, “Transverse damage in glass fiber reinforced polymer under thermo- mechanical loading,” Compos. Part C Open Access, vol. 5, no. April, p. 100147, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100147. 16. R. G. Tangella, P. Kumbhar, and R. K. Annabattula, “Hybrid phase -field modeling of thermo- elastic crack propagation,” Int. J. Comp ut. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 29 – 44, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15502287.2021.1904462. 17. Y. Tan, Y. He, C. Liu, and X. Li, “Phase field fracture model of transversely isotropic piezoelectric materials with thermal effect,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 268, no. October 2021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108479. 18. S. Konica and T. Sain, “Phase -field fracture modeling for unidirectional fiber- reinforced polymer composites,” Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, vol. 100, no. January, p. 105035, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105035. 19. J. Maj et al., “Effect of microstructure on mechanical properties and residual stresses in interpenetrating aluminum -alumina composites fabricated by squeeze casting,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 715, no. December 2017, pp. 154– 162, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.091. 20. J. Zygmuntowicz, M. Piatek, A. Miazga, K. Konopka, and W. Kaszuwara, “Dilatrometric sintering study and characterization of A lumina-nickel composites,” Process. Appl. Ceram., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 111– 117, 2018, doi: 10.2298/pac1802111z. 21. M. Herráez, A. Fernández, C. S. Lopes, and C. González, “Strength and toughness of structural fibers for composite material reinforcement,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 374, no. 2071, 2016, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0274.