PSI - Issue 78

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect

Procedia Structural Integrity 78 (2026) 1159–1166

XX ANIDIS Conference Data-driven and model-based strategies for static monitoring of historic masonry structures Michele Mattiacci a, ∗ , Andrea Meoni a , Branko Glisic b , Filippo Ubertini a

a University of Perugia, Piazza Universita` 1, Perugia 06123, Italy b Princeton University, 54 Olden Street, Princeton 08544, USA

© 2025 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of XX ANIDIS Conference organizers Keywords: Structural Health Monitoring; Static Measurements; Damage Detection; Masonry Structures; Machine Learning; Cointegration; Neural Networks; Bayesian Information Criterion; Finite Element Modeling; Surrogate Modeling Abstract Masonry structures represent a substantial portion of the built environment in Italy and across Europe, often embodying con siderable historical, cultural, and architectural value. Their preservation is increasingly challenging due to material degradation, inadequate maintenance, the climate change impact but most importantly as a consequence of recurrent seismic events. In this context, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) represents a valuable strategy for achieving this objective. Additionally, given the specific peculiarities characterizing masonry structures, static monitoring emerges as a particularly suitable approach for the SHM of historical buildings. Nevertheless, environmental and operational conditions variability can introduce undesired trends in mea sured strain time series, potentially concealing structural response alteration associated with damage. To address this, the proposed work presents a methodological comparison between two innovative static monitoring strategies aimed at such structures. The first is a fully data-driven approach integrating neural networks within the theoretical framework of nonlinear cointegration, enabling the extraction of monitoring features that are insensitive to environmental variability and sensitive to the onset of damage. These features allow the implementation of global as well as sensor-level control charts, enabling not only the identification of the dam age occurrence but also the estimation of its magnitude and location, as well as the precise identification of damage occurrence through change-point analysis techniques. The second strategy, model-based, is rooted in the theory of model class selection: by employing numerical and surrogate models associated with di ff erent damage scenarios, structural identification is performed via inverse calibration, pinpointing the most probable damage scenario occurred on the monitored building, according to a proper selection criterion, and estimating its severity and localization. The present paper focuses on outlining the theoretical formulation, assumptions, and comparative scope of these two complementary methodologies. Their implementation and application to real world monitoring data will be addressed in future work. The comparison between these approaches provides valuable insights for the advanced monitoring and safeguarding of masonry-built heritage.

∗ Corresponding author. E-mail address: michele.mattiacci@dottorandi.unipg.it

2452-3216 © 2025 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of XX ANIDIS Conference organizers 10.1016/j.prostr.2025.12.148