PSI - Issue 78

Matilde Natalizi et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 78 (2026) 449–456

456

Appendix Table 5. Fundamental parameters of fragility curves for typologies defined according to the AeDES form 4B 0.108 0.136 0.165 0.300

1 ( ) 2 ( ) 3 ( ) 4 ( ) 5 ( ) 0.474

0.827 0.905 0.908 0.842 0.966 1.042 0.849 1.015 1.101 0.922 1.159 1.270

5B 6B 4C 5C 6C 4D 5D 6D 4E 5E 6E

0.110 0.120 0.110 0.121 0.148 0.172 0.192 0.226 0.186 0.225 0.316

0.179 0.198 0.155 0.231 0.313 0.215 0.330 0.427 0.264 0.502 0.782

0.250 0.282 0.200 0.352 0.497 0.265 0.479 0.652 0.339 0.797 1.316

0.515 0.577 0.380 0.717 1.083 0.455 1.007 1.389 0.621 1.864 3.056

0.830 0.955 0.597 1.192 1.718 0.707 1.614 2.398 0.951 3.257 5.112

Table 6. Variables assumed for the analysis Analysis variables PGA 0.375 g RC 1350 €/m 2 Interest rate (i) 5 %

Tie rods €/m Number of tie rods 4 per floor Slab stiffening 70 €/m 2 CRM 120 €/m 2 50

Intervention costs

References Baggio, C., Bernardini, A., Colozza, R., Corazza, L., Di Pasquale, G., Dolce, M., Goretti, A., Martinelli, A., Orsini, G., Papa, F., & Zuccaro, G., (2007). Field Manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short-term countermeasures (AeDES). In: A. Pinto and F. Taucer (Eds). Translation from Italian: A. Goretti and M. Rota, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 22868 EN-2007. http://ipsc.jrc.ec.europa.eu Baker, J. W. (2015). Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579 – 599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M Dolce, M., Speranza, E., Giordano, F., Borzi, B., Bocchi, F., Conte, C., Meo, A. Di, Faravelli, M., & Pascale, V., (2019). Observed damage database of past italian earthquakes: The da.D.O. WebGIS. Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata, 60(2), 141 – 164. https://doi.org/10.4430/bgta0254 Dolce, M., Prota, A., Borzi, B., da Porto, F., Lagomarsino, S., Magenes, G., Moroni, C., Penna, A., Polese, M., Speranza, E., Verderame, G.M., Zuccaro, G., (2021). Seismic risk assessment of residential buildings in Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19:2999 – 3032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01009-5 Gr ü nthal, Gottfried., & European Seismological Commission. Working Group “Macroseismic Scales.” (1998). European macroseismic sc ale 1998: EMS-98 (Vol. 15). European Seismological Commission, Subcommission on Engineering Seismology, Working Group Macroseismic scales. INGV. (2016). ShakeMap v4. National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology. http://shakemap.ingv.it/shake4/ (In Italian) L. 64/1974. Legge 64/1974, Provvedimenti per le costruzioni con particolari prescrizioni per le zone sismiche. (in Italian) R.E. 1860. Regolamento Edilizio per la città di Norcia 10 maggio 1860. (in Italian) Tatangelo, M., Audisio, L., D’Amato, M., & Gigliotti, R., (2023a). Seismic risk analysis on masonry buildings damaged by L’Aquila 2009 and Emilia 2012 earthquakes. Procedia Structural Integrity, 44:990-997. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.128 Tatangelo, M., Audisio, L., D’Amato, M., & Gigliotti, R., (2023b). Typological seismic losses assessment by damaged masonry buildings after L’Aquila 2009 and Emilia 2012 earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 9th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Meth -ods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1071 – 1083, Athens, Greece, 2023. DOI: (https://doi.org/10.7712/120123.10458.20639 Tatangelo, M., Audisio, L., D’Amato, M., & Gigliotti, R., (2024). Issues related to typological fragility curves derivation starting from observed

seismic damage. Engineering Structures, 307: 17853. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117853 Bhandari S. B. Discounted payback period, Volume 16 Number 1, ASBBS Annual Conference: Las Vegas, 2009.