PSI - Issue 78

Carla Grandón-Soliz et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 78 (2026) 1505–1512

1509

Table 1. Crowd-Based Inspection: synthesis of consulted platforms and available data

Source

Platform / Type

Date

Info Type

Data

Piers of ~45 m, 42 segments per side, by ABC Chuquisaca

Scribd PDF Project

Technical document

December 2017 Engineering/design

Engineering specifications

Central span 140 m, height 123 m, built with post-tensioned concrete

Infodiez.com

News site

November 2018

Structural & process detail

Highlights record-breaking span and heights

Eju.tv

News image article November 2018

Visual documentation

La Época

News image article November 2018

Construction-phase images

Administradora Boliviana de Carreteras ABC

Social media (X/Twitter, Facebook) Social media (Facebook)

Structure dimensions

Fisculco Bridge has a length of 322m, a height of 120m

December 2018

Tourism / extreme sports

Local tourists did bungee jumps (puenting)

January 2019

Red Uno Sur

Details: 300 m long, central span 140 m, height 123 m, opened December 2018, extreme-sports site

News article (online)

Tourism & construction

Correo del Sur

January 2020

Geocoords: – 18.91703, – 65.42472; identified on OSM (Mapcarta)

Mapcarta

Map data

July 2025

Location/geospatial

Scenic videos, length 322 m, height 130 m

TikTok

Social media

July 2025

Public perception

Potential images near actual bridge (not yet found)

Mapillary

Street-level imagery July 2025

Visual inspection

Visual and geographic information

Coordinates of the Fisculco Bridge 18°55'01"S 65°25'27"W

Google Earth

July 2025

Visual inspection

Coordinates of the Fisculco Bridge -18.917088, -65.424742

Yandex Maps

Map data

July 2025

Visual inspection

Detailed cartographic information

Potential images near actual bridge (not yet found)

Bing Maps

July 2025

Visual inspection

OpenStreetMap (OSM)

Geographic data

July 2025

Visual inspection

Bridge location data

In Fig. 1 some of the collected photographs and visual materials identified during the crowd-based inspections of the Fisculco Bridge are reported. These images, gathered from various public sources provide visual context that supports the analysis of the bridge’s structural characteristics, surrounding environment, and public engagement. In particular, the images of Fig 1a reports a global view of the area where the bridge is located taken Google Maps. Instead, in Fig.1b they are evident the construction phases of the bridge and the characteristics of the structural elements (piles and beams). In the Figs. 1c, 1d, 1e and 1f are reported the images taken from various social media from which the main structural and typological characteristics of the bridge are visible.