PSI - Issue 78
Noemi Di Rienzo et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 78 (2026) 1474–1481
1476
Table 1. Geometric, mechanical and dynamic characteristics of the sample bridges analysed.
Sample
Structural scheme Simply supported
No. of spans
TL ( m )
SL ( m )
DW ( m )
A ( m 2 )
I ( m 4 )
I mode f OMA ( Hz )
II mode f OMA ( Hz )
E ( MPa )
Volto Santo Viaduct (Naples, IT) (Chioccarelli et al., 2024)
4
72.00 18.00 12.95 5.67
1.14∙10 24
7.67
22.27
25272 (a)
Corvara Viaduct (Pescara, IT) (Aloisio et al., 2022)
Simply supported
7
140.00 22.00 8.50 4.37
0.97∙10 24
7.16
23.30
33638 (a)
Dogna Bridge (1978) (Dogna, IT) (Dilena & Morassi, 2011) Sidi-Bou-Ali River Bridge (Sousse governorate, TN) (El-Borgi et al., 2008) IIT Guwahati - NH-31 Bridge (Assam, IN) (Mahato et al., 2017, 2020) Trigno V Bridge (Bagnoli del Trigno, IT) (Tomassini et al., 2023) Sabarmati Bridge (Gujarat, IN) (Patel & Vesmawala, 2017) Bustillo Relief-Road Viaduct (Nogales De Pisuerga, ES) (He et al., 2020) Nine Wells Rail Bridge (Cambridge, UK) (Webb et al., 2017; Whelan et al., 2010) Voigt Drive / I-5 Bridge (California, USA) (Fraser et al., 2010) Dogna Bridge (2008) (Dogna, IT) (Bedon & Morassi, 2014; Dilena et al., 2011) Béni Khiar Bridge (Béni Khiar, TN) (Bahlous et al., 2013)
Simply supported
4
64.40 16.10 5.85 2.20
0.35∙10 24
9.43
26.22
32000 (a)
Simply supported
8
200.00 25.00 14.60 9.03
2.14∙10 24
4.29
-
32300 (a)
Simply supported
3
88.00 39.00 9.85 5.81
3.57∙10 24
3.13
7.74
32000 (b)
Simply supported
7
235.90 33.70 11.50 4.93
2.19∙10 24
3.85
12.67
-
Simply supported
12
512.00 42.50 9.78 5.69
4.41∙10 24
1.88
-
-
Simply supported
1
17.22 17.22 11.77 4.60
0.75∙10 24
7.54
29.24
-
Continuous beam
3
87.70 27.20 28.3 32.2 90.00 16.15 28.86 28.96 15.24 75,00 37.50 37.50 56.00 12.10 15.90 15.90 12.10 122.00 38.00 46.00 38.00 140.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
14.98 11.73 5.47∙10 24
4.53
5.84
37277 (b)
Continuous beam
4
12.19 5.31
3.04∙10 24
4.91
12.15
-
Continuous beam
2
10.50 8.08
1.15∙10 24
2.02
3.18
43200 (a)
Continuous beam
4
10.00 6.00
0.18∙10 24
4.98
6.54
-
Geumdang Bridge (Icheon, KR) (Lynch et al., 2006) Forg Bridge (South, IR) (Akbari et al., 2019)
Continuous beam
3
12.60 8.87
8.01∙10 24
2.98
4.35
-
Continuous beam
4
11.80 9.89
4.90∙10 24
3.04
3.53
31759 (b)
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Maker