PSI - Issue 78

Noemi Di Rienzo et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 78 (2026) 1474–1481

1476

Table 1. Geometric, mechanical and dynamic characteristics of the sample bridges analysed.

Sample

Structural scheme Simply supported

No. of spans

TL ( m )

SL ( m )

DW ( m )

A ( m 2 )

I ( m 4 )

I mode f OMA ( Hz )

II mode f OMA ( Hz )

E ( MPa )

Volto Santo Viaduct (Naples, IT) (Chioccarelli et al., 2024)

4

72.00 18.00 12.95 5.67

1.14∙10 24

7.67

22.27

25272 (a)

Corvara Viaduct (Pescara, IT) (Aloisio et al., 2022)

Simply supported

7

140.00 22.00 8.50 4.37

0.97∙10 24

7.16

23.30

33638 (a)

Dogna Bridge (1978) (Dogna, IT) (Dilena & Morassi, 2011) Sidi-Bou-Ali River Bridge (Sousse governorate, TN) (El-Borgi et al., 2008) IIT Guwahati - NH-31 Bridge (Assam, IN) (Mahato et al., 2017, 2020) Trigno V Bridge (Bagnoli del Trigno, IT) (Tomassini et al., 2023) Sabarmati Bridge (Gujarat, IN) (Patel & Vesmawala, 2017) Bustillo Relief-Road Viaduct (Nogales De Pisuerga, ES) (He et al., 2020) Nine Wells Rail Bridge (Cambridge, UK) (Webb et al., 2017; Whelan et al., 2010) Voigt Drive / I-5 Bridge (California, USA) (Fraser et al., 2010) Dogna Bridge (2008) (Dogna, IT) (Bedon & Morassi, 2014; Dilena et al., 2011) Béni Khiar Bridge (Béni Khiar, TN) (Bahlous et al., 2013)

Simply supported

4

64.40 16.10 5.85 2.20

0.35∙10 24

9.43

26.22

32000 (a)

Simply supported

8

200.00 25.00 14.60 9.03

2.14∙10 24

4.29

-

32300 (a)

Simply supported

3

88.00 39.00 9.85 5.81

3.57∙10 24

3.13

7.74

32000 (b)

Simply supported

7

235.90 33.70 11.50 4.93

2.19∙10 24

3.85

12.67

-

Simply supported

12

512.00 42.50 9.78 5.69

4.41∙10 24

1.88

-

-

Simply supported

1

17.22 17.22 11.77 4.60

0.75∙10 24

7.54

29.24

-

Continuous beam

3

87.70 27.20 28.3 32.2 90.00 16.15 28.86 28.96 15.24 75,00 37.50 37.50 56.00 12.10 15.90 15.90 12.10 122.00 38.00 46.00 38.00 140.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00

14.98 11.73 5.47∙10 24

4.53

5.84

37277 (b)

Continuous beam

4

12.19 5.31

3.04∙10 24

4.91

12.15

-

Continuous beam

2

10.50 8.08

1.15∙10 24

2.02

3.18

43200 (a)

Continuous beam

4

10.00 6.00

0.18∙10 24

4.98

6.54

-

Geumdang Bridge (Icheon, KR) (Lynch et al., 2006) Forg Bridge (South, IR) (Akbari et al., 2019)

Continuous beam

3

12.60 8.87

8.01∙10 24

2.98

4.35

-

Continuous beam

4

11.80 9.89

4.90∙10 24

3.04

3.53

31759 (b)

Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Maker