PSI - Issue 78

Mirko Calò et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 78 (2026) 710–717

717

The other authors acknowledge the support of Fabre - “Resear Consortium for the evaluation and monitoring of bridges, ad ts, and t er str t res” www.consorziofabre.it) t r t e r je t “ ABRE -ANAS 2021 –2024”. T e an s r t re le ts nly t e a t rs’ e s and n ns; ne t er t e E r ean Un n n r t e E r ean Commission or FABRE Consortium can be considered responsible for them. References Earthquake Eng. 20, 7137-7159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01491-z Baker, J.W., 2014. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579 – 599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113eqs025m Calò, M., Ruggieri, S., Buitrago, M., Nettis, A., Adam, J. M., & Uva, G. (2024). An ML-based framework for predicting prestressing force reduction in reinforced concrete box-girder bridges with unbonded tendons. Eng. Struct. 325, 119400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119400 Calvi, G.M., Moratti, M, O'Reilly, G.J., Scattarreggia, N., Monteiro, R., Malomo, D., Calvi, P.M., Pinho, R., 2018. Once upon a Time in Italy: The Tale of the Morandi Bridge. Struct. Eng. Int. 29(2), 198-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1558033 Celik, O.C., Ellingwood, B.R., 2009. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames – Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Struct. Saf. 32(1), 1 – 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003 Chen, T., Guestrin, C., 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Minin. San Francisco, CA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 Choe, D., Gardoni, P., Rosowsky, D., Haukaas, T., 2008. Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion. Struct. Saf. 31(4), 275 – 283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.10.00 Dizaj, E.A., Salami, M.R., Kashani, M.M., (2023). Impact of asymmetrical corrosion of piers on seismic fragility of ageing irregular concrete bridges. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 1 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2271887 Du, Y.G., Clark, L.A., Chan, A.H.C., 2005. Residual capacity of corroded reinforcing bars. Mag. Concr. Res. 57(3), 135 – 147. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2005.57.3.135 Freeman, S.A., 2004. Review of the development of the capacity spectrum method. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 41, pp.1-13. Iman, R.L., Conover, W.J., 1982. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Commun. Stat.- Simul. Comput. 11(3), 311 – 334. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918208812265 Lee, H., Cho, Y, 2009. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of steel reinforcement embedded in concrete specimen as a function of the degree of reinforcement corrosion. Int. J. Fract. 157, 81 – 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9334-7 Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., Park, R., 1998. Theoretical Stress ‐ Strain Model for Confined Concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) Mangalathu, S., Heo, G., Jeon, J., 2018. Artificial neural network based multi-dimensional fragility development of skewed concrete bridge classes. Eng. Struct. 162, 166 – 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.053 MIT, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, 2020. Linee Guida per la Classificazione e Gestione del Rischio, la Valutazione della Sicurezza ed il Monitoraggio dei Ponti Esistenti [Italian version] Neduri, H., Ghosh, J., 2024. Fragility interval predictions in non- se s ally des ned br d es, n “ Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Djgitalization and Sustainability ” . CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003483755-227 ett s, A., Ra aele, D., U a, ., 2024. e s r sk‑ n r ed r r t sat n lt ‑s an R rder br d es ns der n kn led e‑based uncertainty. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 22, 693-729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01783-y Opabola, E. A., 2022. Residual seismic capacity of beam-column components with corroded reinforcement. Constr. Build. Mater. 332, 127269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127269 O’Re lly, .J., 2021. e s ntens ty eas res r r sk assess ent br d es. B ll. Eart q ake En . 19 9 , 3671– 3699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01114-z Pitilakis, K., Franchin, P., Khazai, B., Wenzel, H., 2014. SYNER-G: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Complex Urban, Utility, Lifeline Systems and Critical Facilities, in “Geote hni al, geologi al and earthquake engineering” . Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8835-9 Ruggieri, S., Calò, M., Cardellicchio, A., Uva, G., 2022. Analyt al‑ e an al based ra e rk r se s erall ra l ty analys s ex st n RC buildings in town compartments. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 20, 8179-8216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01516-7 al at re, W., U a, ., enanz , ., azz tt , ., r , ., atal , A., Dall’Asta, A., Ubert n , ., annella, ., e r , L., Pellicanò, F., Calò, M., Cardillo, E., Nettis, A., Bencivenga, P., Brando, G., Borlenghi, P., Carbonari, S., Clemente, P., . . . Proverbio, E., 2024. Application of Italian Guidelines for structural-foundational and seismic risk classification of bridges: the Fabre experience on a large bridge inventory. Procedia Struct. Integrity 62, 1 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.009 Smerzini, C., Galasso, C., Iervolino, I., Paolucci, R., 2014. Ground motion record selection based on broadband spectral compatibility. Earthquake Spectra 30(4), 1427 – 1448. https://doi.org/10.1193/052312eqs197m Scott M.L., Lee S.-I., 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach, CA. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874 Stefanidou, S.P., Kappos, A.J., 2019. Bridge-specific fragility analysis: When is it really necessary?. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17, 2245 – 2280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00525-9 Abar a, A., nte r , R., O’Re lly, .J., 2022. Ex s re kn led e a t n re nal se s r sk assess ent brd e rt olios. Bull.