PSI - Issue 77
C.F.F. Gomes et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 77 (2026) 95–102 Gomes et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2026) 000–000
102
8
4 Conclusions This study investigated the mechanical performance of tubular adhesive joints using different combinations of adherends and adhesives. A validated CZM approach was employed to predict P m and U . The main conclusions are as follows: • DIN 55Si7 steel consistently achieved the highest P m , with values up to 64.8 kN for L O =40 mm. This superior performance is attributed to its high stiffness and limited plastic deformation. • The brittle AV138 provided the highest Pm across all adherends and L O , particularly when paired with DIN 55Si7. The ductile 7752 exhibited the lowest Pm but provided the most progressive failure. The moderately ductile 2015 offered a favorable compromise, achieving high U and competitive P m , particularly in aluminum and CFRP joints. • The highest U was recorded in aluminum joints bonded with the 2015, reaching 33.2 J at L O =40 mm, benefiting from adherend plasticization. In CFRP and steel joints, the 2015 adhesive also demonstrated the best U capacity. The AV138, despite its strength, exhibited lower U values due to its brittle nature, while the 7752, although ductile, had a more stable but limited U profile. Overall, the results highlight the importance of selecting adhesive-adherend combinations tailored to application specific requirements, whether prioritizing P m or U . These findings offer guidelines for the design of reliable and efficient tubular adhesive joints in structural applications. References Barbosa, D. R., Campilho, R., Rocha, R. J. B., Ferreira, L. R. F., 2019. Experimental and numerical assessment of tensile loaded tubular adhesive joints. Proceedings Of The Institution Of Mechanical Engineers Part L-Journal Of Materials-Design And Applications 233(3): 452-464. Campilho, R. D., Banea, M. D., Pinto, A. M., da Silva, L. F., De Jesus, A., 2011. Strength prediction of single-and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 31(5): 363-372. Campilho, R. D. S. G., Banea, M. D., Neto, J. A. B. P., da Silva, L. F. M., 2013. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 44: 48-56. Campilho, R. D. S. G., de Moura, M. F. S. F., Domingues, J. J. M. S., 2005. Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials. Composites Science and Technology 65(13): 1948-1958. Damm, J., Albiez, M., Ummenhofer, T., Göddecke, J., Meschut, G., Kötz, F., Matzenmiller, A., 2023. Experimental and numerical investigation of the damping properties of adhesively bonded tubular steel joints. The Journal of Adhesion: 1-31. de Miguel, A. G., Pagani, A., Rizzo, L., Catapano, A., Panettieri, E., 2020. Accurate evaluation of 3D stress fields in adhesive bonded joints via higher-order FE models. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures 27(4): 333-345. Faneco, T. M. S., Campilho, R. D. S. G., Silva, F. J. G., Lopes, R. M., 2017. Strength and fracture characterization of a novel polyurethane adhesive for the automotive industry. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 45(2): 398-407. Islam, S., Ahmed, B., Roy, J., Shamim, S., Tusher, H., Alam, S., Hasan, M. R. (2022). Investigation on Progressive Damage of CFRP Strengthening Tubular Stainless Steel Member Under Concentrated Loading. Advances in Civil Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICACE 2020, Springer. Jokinen, J., Wallin, M., Saarela, O., 2015. Applicability of VCCT in mode I loading of yielding adhesively bonded joints—a case study. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 62: 85-91. Kadioglu, F., Adams, R. D., 2015. Flexible adhesives for automotive application under impact loading. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 56: 73-78. Neto, J. A. B. P., Campilho, R. D. S. G., da Silva, L. F. M., 2012. Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 37(0): 96-101. Oliveira, T. J. S., Campilho, R. D. S. G., Cardoso, M. G., 2021. Three-dimensional numerical analysis of tubular adhesive joints under torsional loads. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1193(1): 012082. Omar, Z., Sugiman, S., Yusoff, M. M., Ahmad, H., 2022. Predicting the flexural behaviour of CFRP-strengthened concrete beam using combined XFEM and cohesive zone model. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 25(6): 1077-1090. Rocha, R. J. B., Campilho, R. D. S. G., 2018. Evaluation of different modelling conditions in the cohesive zone analysis of single-lap bonded joints. The Journal of Adhesion 94(7): 562-582. Shi, C., Wang, A., Zhu, X., 2022. Research on cohesive failure behavior and parameter sensitivity of rubber–SET under cohesive zone model. Engineering Failure Analysis 140: 106492. Sun, F., Zhang, R., Blackman, B. R., 2021. Determination of the mode I crack tip opening rate and the rate dependent cohesive properties for structural adhesive joints using digital image correlation. International Journal of Solids and Structures 217: 60-73. Valente, J. P. A., Campilho, R. D. S. G., Marques, E. A. S., Machado, J. J. M., da Silva, L. F. M., 2019. Adhesive joint analysis under tensile impact loads by cohesive zone modelling. Composite Structures 222: 110894.
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker