Issue 75

V. Thondamon et alii, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 75 (2026) 88-103; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.75.08

1.5

SP6-60-TWC-SSW-M1 SSPW 6-25 SSPW 12-27 SINTAP

Unstable

BS 7910 2A BS 7910 2B

Critical

1.0

Stable

0.5

Fracture ratio, Kr

L r

max

L

max

r

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Load ratio, Lr

Figure 8: FAD using limit load moment by Takahashi and initiation fracture toughness.

1.5

SP6-60-TWC-SSW-M1 SSPW 6-25 SSPW 12-27 SINTAP

Unstable

BS 7910 2A BS 7910 2B

Critical

1.0

0.5

Stable

Fracture ratio, Kr

L r

L

max

max

r

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Load ratio, Lr

Figure 9: FAD using limit load moment by Zahoor and J-integral using load-CMOD method.

1.5

SP6-60-TWC-SSW-M1 SSPW 6-25 SSPW 12-27 SINTAP

Unstable

BS 7910 2A BS 7910 2B

Critical

1.0

0.5

Fracture ratio, Kr Stable

L r

max

L

max

r

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Load ratio, Lr

Figure 10: FAD using limit load moment by Takahashi and J-integral using load-CMOD method.

96

Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker