Issue 75
V. Thondamon et alii, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 75 (2026) 88-103; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.75.08
1.5
SP6-60-TWC-SSW-M1 SSPW 6-25 SSPW 12-27 SINTAP
Unstable
BS 7910 2A BS 7910 2B
Critical
1.0
Stable
0.5
Fracture ratio, Kr
L r
max
L
max
r
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Load ratio, Lr
Figure 8: FAD using limit load moment by Takahashi and initiation fracture toughness.
1.5
SP6-60-TWC-SSW-M1 SSPW 6-25 SSPW 12-27 SINTAP
Unstable
BS 7910 2A BS 7910 2B
Critical
1.0
0.5
Stable
Fracture ratio, Kr
L r
L
max
max
r
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Load ratio, Lr
Figure 9: FAD using limit load moment by Zahoor and J-integral using load-CMOD method.
1.5
SP6-60-TWC-SSW-M1 SSPW 6-25 SSPW 12-27 SINTAP
Unstable
BS 7910 2A BS 7910 2B
Critical
1.0
0.5
Fracture ratio, Kr Stable
L r
max
L
max
r
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Load ratio, Lr
Figure 10: FAD using limit load moment by Takahashi and J-integral using load-CMOD method.
96
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker