PSI - Issue 71
Garima Choudhary et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 71 (2025) 424–429
429
5. Conclusion The incorporation of gluconic acid (GA) in concrete mixtures demonstrates clear benefits in terms of setting time control, workability retention, compressive strength enhancement, and durability. Experimental results show that GA, when used in dosages ranging from 0.02% to 0.1% by weight of cement, effectively extends both the initial and final setting times of cement paste, making it highly suitable for applications requiring prolonged workability. In particular, a 0.1% GA dosage extended the initial setting time to 170 minutes and the final setting time to 550 minutes, while maintaining a slump above 150 mm for up to 180 minutes. Furthermore, unlike most conventional retarders that tend to reduce early strength, GA enhanced the compressive strength of concrete. A 10.8% strength gain was observed at 3 days, and a 6% increase was noted at 28 days compared to the control mix. Durability performance, assessed via the Rapid Chloride Permeability Test (RCPT), confirmed that all GA-treated mixes exhibited extremely low chloride ion penetration, indicating no adverse effects on long-term concrete performance. Overall, GA proves to be a promising, bio-based retarding admixture that not only meets the requirements of modern RMC applications but also aligns with sustainability goals. Its dual performance - enhancing both fresh and hardened properties - positions it as a viable alternative to traditional chemical retarders in high-performance concrete formulations. Acknowledgement The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Department of Civil Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology (VNIT), Nagpur, for providing the necessary laboratory facilities and technical support to carry out this research. References A. Jaiswal, T. Singh, A. Jha, M. Ankita, Assessing Quality in Ready-Mix Concrete Production: A Case Study of B. L. Kashyap and Sons Ltd, Review of Professional Management, 2023. American Concrete Institute (ACI), ACI 304.2R-96 (Reapproved 2008): Placing Concrete by Pumping Methods, 2008. ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration, ASTM C1202-12, 2012. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 12269 (1987): 53 grade ordinary Portland cement, 1987.Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 383-2016: Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete, 2016. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 4031-3 (1988): Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement, Part 3: Determination of soundness, 1988. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1199 (1959): Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete, 1959. Cement and Concrete Sectional Committee, CEO 2 FOREWORD, Bureau of Indian Standards, India. Indian Standard, Concrete Mix Proportioning Guidelines (Second Revision), IS 10262:2019, Bureau of Indian Standards, India. J. Liu, C. Yu, X. Shu, Q. Ran, Y. Yang, Recent advance of chemical admixtures in concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 124, 2019. J. Plank, E. Sakai, C. W. Miao, C. Yu, J. X. Hong, 2015. Chemical admixtures - Chemistry, applications and their impact on concrete microstructure and durability, Cement and Concrete Research. 78, 81 – 99. K. D. Bedada, A. O. Nyabuto, I. K. Kinoti, J. M. Marangu, 2023. Review on advances in bio-based admixtures for concrete, Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, vol. 8, pp. 344 – 367. L. Cheng, R. Huang, J. Ying, Y. Fu, X. Zhou, K. Jiang, 2023. Sequential Bioprocess with Gluconobacter oxydans and Candida tropicalis for Gluconic Acid and Single-Cell Protein Production from Enzymatic Hydrolysate, Fermentation, vol. 9. M. L. R., S. R. Anvekar, Recent Developments in the Indian Ready Mixed Concrete Industry: Effects on Sustainable Construction, 2015. O. Kabus, L. Butska, O. Makarenko, L. Pershina, A. Tymoshchenko, Evaluating the efficiency of the fluidity retention of ready-mix concrete during the transportation of it to the construction site, in MATEC Web of Conferences. 230, EDP Sciences, 2018. Ouyang, X., Zhou, J., and Ye, G. 2006. Effect of sodium gluconate on cement hydration and rheological behavior. Adv. Cem. Res., 18(3), 105 – 113. Plank, J., and Sachsenhauser, B. 2009. Experimental determination of the adsorption isotherm of sodium gluconate on hydrating cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 39(1), 1 – 5. S. Chib, V. L. Jamwal, V. Kumar, S. G. Gandhi, S. Saran, 2023. Fungal production of kojic acid and its industrial applications, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 107, 2111 – 2130. Shah, S. F. A., Ahmad, M. R., and Junaid, M. T. 2016. Evaluation of the performance of commercially available chemical admixtures in high-strength concrete. Constr. Build. Mater., 114, 381 – 389. T. Leandro, M. C. Oliveira, M. M. R. da Fonseca, M. T. Cesário,2023. Co-Production of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and Gluconic Acid from Glucose by Halomonas elongata, Bioengineering, vol. 10. Yousuf, M., Johari, M. M., Ahmad, Z. A., and Maslehuddin, M. 2014. Influence of organic retarders on setting time and early strength of cement pastes. Constr. Build. Mater., 52, 427 – 435. Zingg, A., Winnefeld, F., Holzer, L., Pakusch, J., Becker, S., and Gauckler, L. 2008. Adsorption of polyelectrolytes and retardation of cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Compos., 30(10), 888 – 895.
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Maker