Issue 71

P. Doubek et alii, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 71 (2025) 67-79; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.71.06

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

4100%

2500%

Frequency of detected defects 0 5

300% 200%

100% 100%

0% 0% 0% 0%

(0.14, 0.20>

(0.38, 0.44>

(0.32, 0.38>

(0.44, 0.50>

(0.56, 0.62>

(0.08, 0.14>

(0.20, 0.26>

(0.26, 0.32>

(0.02, 0.08>

(0.50, 0.56>

Interval of maximum length [mm]

Figure 6: Distribution of frequency of defects detected in sample T34

25

2200%

20

15

10

5

Frequency of detected defects

200%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0

(0.14, 0.20>

(0.20, 0.26>

(0.32, 0.38>

(0.44, 0.50>

(0.56, 0.62>

(0.08, 0.14>

(0.02, 0.08>

(0.26, 0.32>

(0.38, 0.44>

(0.50, 0.56>

Interval of maximum length [mm]

Figure 7: Distribution of frequency of defects detected in sample ST9/14

140

12200%

120

11000%

100

80

60

40

Frequency of detected defects

20

1400%

700%

100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0

(0.08, 0.14>

(0.20, 0.26>

(0.32, 0.38>

(0.44, 0.50>

(0.56, 0.62>

(0.02, 0.08>

(0.14, 0.20>

(0.26, 0.32>

(0.38, 0.44>

(0.50, 0.56>

Interval of maximum length [mm]

Figure 8: Distribution of frequency of defects detected in sample N9/17

73