Issue 67
D. Scorza et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 67 (2024) 280-291; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.67.20
1
3 0
2
0 0
v
v
(3)
1
1
L
c
1
3 2 c v L v L L 2 2
0
(4)
2 M t
1
2
L
3 1 v L v L 2 1 1 1
L
L
x
x t,L
dt
with
(5)
12 1 ,
12 ,
c
L
L
IE
1
c
c
1 M t
1
2
L
3 2 1 v L v L 2 2 1
1 0
L
x
t x,L
dt
with
(6)
21 1 ,
21 ,
c
L
L
IE
c
c
1 1 2 1 v L v L
(7)
1 1 IE M L
1 1 2 1 1 1 v L v L v L L v L 2 1 1 2 4 1 1 c
(8)
k k
1
1
4 1 2 4 c v L v L v L v L L L 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 c 5 1 3 5 c v L v L v L v L L L 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 c 1 1
(9)
(10)
where v 1 and v 2 are the transverse displacements of the left and right beam segments, respectively, I is the moment of inertia, E is the elastic modulus, M 1 and M 2 are the bending moments related to the left and right beam segments, respectively, and L c is the material internal characteristic length (0.0 < L c /L ≤ ).
(a)
y
a
L 1
O
H
x
B
L
(b)
y
k
v 2
v 1
O
H
x
B
L 1
F
L
Figure 1: Edge-cracked nanobeam: (a) undeformed configuration and (b) schematisation according to the present formulation, both in the undeformed and in the deformed configuration.
282
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog