PSI - Issue 66

Ram Lal Riyar et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 66 (2024) 181–194 Ram Lal Riyar et. al./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2025) 000–000

193 13

 For all lightly reinforced concrete beams, the charts depicting the relationship between load and CMOD, as well as load and midspan displacement, reveal that the slopes of the beginning segment overlap. This is because the reinforcement has not yet started to work and just the rigidity of plain concrete is represented. The initial load peak corresponds to a notable increase in longitudinal strain and facilitates load transfer to the steel bar. The CMOD and mid-span displacement exhibit a gradual increase at a constant load as the plastic stresses in the reinforcement become more pronounced. This observation suggests a ductile behaviour commonly observed in lightly reinforced concrete beams. With higher reinforcement ratios in these beams, there is an augmented ductility, a greater number of microcracks, and an expanded width of microcracks.  Three sizes of specimens with various reinforcement percentages were used for the size effect experiments. The observations of size effect in RC beams are in the range of the size effect law.  The crack length for larger diameter bars is less compared to low diameter bars, and it requires higher energy, i.e., the reinforcement resisting crack propagation in the beam. For large-sized beams, the crack length is larger, and it requires less energy to expand the crack i.e., crack propagation becomes more favorable as the beam size increases.  The peak load is decreased by 11.5% when the corrosion is 5%, the peak load is reduced by 24.9% when the corrosion is 10%, and the peak load is decreased by 27.14% when the corrosion is 15%.  Corrosion results in material mass loss, which reduces cross-sectional area and weakens the structure. This material loss may lower the material's overall ability to absorb energy, which lessens fracture energy.  Corrosion has a negative impact on a material's fracture toughness, making it more prone to brittle fracture. The decrease in strength of the corroded beam is also corroborated by a reduction in FPZ length as observed from DIC analysis. Acknowledgment The authors acknowledge the support of the staff of the Structural Testing Laboratory at the National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India, for the experimentation work reported in this paper. References [1] Bazant Zdenek P. (1984). Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, rock, metal. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 110, pp. 518–535. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518). [2] Weibull, Waloddi. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics. DOI: https://hal.science/hal 03112318. [3] Bazant Zdenek P and Yu, Qiang. (2005). Designing against size effect on shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without stirrups: I. Formulation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131, pp. 1877–1885. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1877). [4] Bazant, Zdenek P and Kazemi, Mohammad T. (1991) Size effect on diagonal shear failure of beams without stirrups. Journal of Structural Engineering, 88, pp. 268–276. DOI: 10.14359/3097. [5] Syroka-Korol, E and Tejchman, J. (2014). Experimental investigations of size effect in reinforced concrete beams failing by shear. Engineering Structures, 58, 63–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.012. [6] Syroka-Korol, E and Tejchman, J. (2018). Experimental study of shear strength and failure mechanisms in RC beams scaled along height or length. Engineering Structures, 157, pp. 203–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.003. [7] Prashanth, MH and Singh, Parvinder and Kishen, JM Chandra. (2019) Role of longitudinal reinforcement on the behavior of under reinforced concrete beams subjected to fatigue loading. International Journal of Fatigue, 125, pp. 271–290. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.047. [8] El Maaddawy, Tamer A and Soudki, Khaled A. (2003). Effectiveness of impressed current technique to simulate corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 15, pp. 41–47. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(41). [9] Hailong Ye, Chuanqing Fu, Nanguo Jin, Xianyu Jin. (2018). Performance of reinforced concrete beams corroded under sustained service loads: A comparative study of two accelerated corrosion techniques. Construction and Building Materials, 162, pp. 286–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.108. [10] Chayanon Hansapinyo, Vanissorn Vimonsatit, Manabu Matsushima, Suchart Limkatanyu. (2021). Critical amount of corrosion and failure behavior of flexural reinforced concrete beams. Construction and building materials, 270, pp. 121–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121448. [11] J.R. Lliso-Ferrando, I. Gasch, A. Mart´  nez-Ibernon, M. Valcuende. (2022). Effect of macrocell currents on rebar corrosion in reinforced concrete structures exposed to a marine environment. Ocean Engineering, 257, pp. 111–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111680. [12] H. Lian, X. Sun, Z. Yu, Y. Lian, L. Xie, A. Long, Z. Guan. (2022). Study on the dynamic fracture properties and size effect of concrete based on DIC technology. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 274, pp. 108–789. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108789. [13] M.A. Sutton, W. Wolters, W. Peters, W. Ranson, S. McNeill. (1983) Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method. Image Vision Computing, 3, pp. 133–139. DOI: 10.1016/0262-8856(83)90064-1.

Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator