Issue 65

A. Hartawan Mettanadi et al., Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 65 (2023) 135-159; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.65.10

Figure 19: Different arrangement of thickness in category 2.

For total energy absorption, which can be observed in Fig. 20, the results similar to the MCF case will be found, namely if objects with a greater thickness were placed at the top in Category 1 and 2 in this case (2-1-1 and 2-2-1 ), the value will be greater than if the larger thickness was placed at the bottom in each category (1-1-2 and 1-2-2), and the lowest results in each category were found if identical thicknesses were placed at the top and bottom while the middle was placed a different

154