PSI - Issue 62

Marco Perazzi et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 62 (2024) 225–232 M. Perazzi et al./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

231

7

Furthermore, the SMS developed include a specific part regarding the coordination and management of the emergency in accordance with the UNI ISO 22325:2019 standards. The ANSFISA SMS was developed with a double performance control system in relation to safety objectives and regulatory compliance objectives, compatible with continuous improvement and P,D,C,A cycle in the system and processes. The ANSFISA SMS can be integrated with other Management Systems according to the main aspects defined in the latest IWA ISO 31:2020 standards "Risk management - Guidelines on using ISO 31000 in management systems" and with reference to the other Management Systems based on ISO standards which they have a High Level Structure (HLS), in particular UNI ISO 45001 and UNI 10617 (Seveso III); Finally, the ANSFISA SMS is compatible with the risk assessment methods contained in the ISO/IEC 31010:2019 "Risk management – Risk assessment technique" standard and can be interfaced with infrastructure maintenance management systems. For the reasons indicated above and also illustrated in figure 2, the ANSFISA SMS is the model that best lends itself to the integration of the various existing systems and can be used for the maintenance and safety of railways and internal roads, for the safety of goods handling operations in yards and finally for the loading and unloading and arrival and departure operations of ships. 6. Conclusions This work, after extensive in-depth analysis of the reality of the port sector, has identified a model of safety management system suitable for multimodal transport networks. The Italian model developed by Ansfisa, having been developed in a logic of harmonization of the rules already used in the aeronautical, railway and road-motorway sectors, is the one that allows filling a gap at a European regulatory level and which has the most adequate characteristics for a future experimentation. References ANSFISA (Italian Agency for Safety of Railways and Road Infrastructures), 2022. Guidelines for the implementation, certification and performance evaluation of Safety Management Systems for the verification and maintenance of road and highway infrastructures. (in Italian). Andriani, D.P., Novianti, V.D., Adnandy, R., A’yunin, Q., 2019. Quantitative risk modelling of occupational safety in green-port. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 546, 052007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/546/5/052007 Antão, P., Calderón, M., Puig, M., Michail, A., Wooldridge, C., Darbra, R.M., 2016. Identification of Occupational Health, Safety, Security (OHSS) and Environmental Performance Indicators in port areas. Safety Science 85, 266 – 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.031 Ayesu, E.K., Sakyi, D., Darku, A.B., 2023. Seaport efficiency, port throughput, and economic growth in Africa. Marit Econ Logist 25, 479 – 498. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00252-8 Cepolina, S., Ghiara, H., 2013. New trends in port strategies. Emerging role for ICT infrastructures. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Port Performance and Strategy 8, 195 – 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.07.001 CSLLPP (Italian Higher Council of Public Works), 2020. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Bridges, Ministry Decree n. 578/2020 (in Italian). CSLLPP (Italian Higher Council of Public Works), 2022a. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Bridges, Ministry Decree n. 204/2022 (in Italian). CSLLPP (Italian Higher Council of Public Works), 2022b. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Tunnels, Ministry Decree n. 247/2022 (in Italian). De Bartolomeo, D., Renzi, E., Tamasi, G., Palermo, G., Nucci, F.D., 2023. The Italian Risk-Based approach for the development of an Integrated Safety Management System for Road Infrastructures and its Relations with innovative guidelines on the risk management of existing bridges. Transportation Research Procedia, AIIT 3rd International Conference on Transport Infrastructure and Systems (TIS ROMA 2022), 15th-16th September 2022, Rome, Italy 69, 886 – 893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.249 De Martino, M., Magnotti, F., Morvillo, A., 2020. Port governance and value creation in the supply chain: The case of Italian ports. Case Studies on Transport Policy 8, 373 – 382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.10.004 EASA, 2017. Management System Assessment Tool. URL https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/general-publications/management- system-assessment-tool (accessed 11.27.23). ERA, 2018. Common Safety Methods on Safety Management System Requirements. URL https://www.era.europa.eu/domains/common-safety- methods/safety-management-system-requirements-csm_en (accessed 11.27.23). Fang, L., Wei, L., Zhao, X., Jiang, L., 2017. Research and development of safety risk prevention and management system for port enterprise, in: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA). Presented at the 2017 IEEE Internationa l Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), pp. 1127 – 1131. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICInfA.2017.8079071 Ferrari, C., Parola, F., Tei, A., 2015. Governance models and port concessions in Europe: Commonalities, critical issues and policy perspectives. Transport Policy, Special Issue articles on Economic regulation of transport infrastructures – theory and practices edited by Marco Ponti, Beria