PSI - Issue 62

Fabio Parisi et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 62 (2024) 701–709 F. Parisi et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia -- (2024) _ – _

708

8

features and to assess the propagation of the involved errors in risk assessment.

(a) (b) Figure 7 RF (dash-dotted) and NLTHA (continuous) power law models with varying for P3 (a) and P4 (b).

References

Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O., Lengauer, T., 2010. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics 26, 1340 – 1347. Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn 45, 5 – 32. Breiman, L., 1996. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24, 123 – 140. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., Stone, C., 1984. Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Int. Group (New York) 37, 237 – 251. Celik, O.C., Ellingwood, B.R., 2010. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames – Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Structural Safety 32, 1 – 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003 Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O., Foutch, D.A., 2002. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of structural engineering 128, 526 – 533. Du, A., Padgett, J.E., 2020. Investigation of multivariate seismic surrogate demand modeling for multi-response structural systems. Eng Struct 207, 110210. Guo, J., Alam, M.S., Wang, J., Li, S., Yuan, W., 2020. Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand models of a cable-stayed bridge based on generalized linear regression models. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 131, 106024. Kazemi, F., Asgarkhani, N., Jankowski, R., 2023. Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 166, 107761. Lin, Y., Nie, Z., Ma, H., 2017. Structural damage detection with automatic feature-extraction through deep learning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 32, 1025 – 1046. Mangalathu, S., Heo, G., Jeon, J.-S., 2018a. Artificial neural network based multi-dimensional fragility development of skewed concrete bridge classes. Eng Struct 162, 166 – 176. Mangalathu, S., Hwang, S.-H., Choi, E., Jeon, J.-S., 2019. Rapid seismic damage evaluation of bridge portfolios using machine learning techniques. Eng Struct 201, 109785. Mangalathu, S., Jeon, J.-S., 2019. Stripe-based fragility analysis of multispan concrete bridge classes using machine learning techniques. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 48, 1238 – 1255. Mangalathu, S., Jeon, J.S., DesRoches, R., 2018b. Critical uncertainty parameters influencing seismic performance of bridges using Lasso regression. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47, 784 – 801. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2991 McKenna, F., 2011. OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Comput Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.66 Monteiro, R., 2016. Sampling based numerical seismic assessment of continuous span RC bridges. Eng Struct 118, 407 – 420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.068 Nettis, A., Gentile, R., Raffaele, D., Uva, G., Galasso, C., 2021. Cloud Capacity Spectrum Method: Accounting for record-to-record variability in fragility analysis using nonlinear static procedures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 150, 106829. Nettis, A., Raffaele, D., Uva, G., 2023. Seismic risk-informed prioritisation of multi-span RC girder bridges considering knowledge-based uncertainty. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01783-y Nettis, A., Saponaro, M., Nanna, M., 2020. RPAS-based framework for simplified seismic risk assessment of Italian RC-bridges. Buildings 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS10090150 Parr, T., Turgutlu, K., Csiszar, C., Howard, J., 2018. Beware Default Random Forest Importances [WWW Document]. explained.ai. Parr, T., Wilson, J.D., Hamrick, J., 2020. Nonparametric feature impact and importance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04750. Smerzini, C., Galasso, C., Iervolino, I., Paolucci, R., 2014. Ground motion record selection based on broadband spectral compatibility. Earthquake Spectra 30, 1427 – 1448. https://doi.org/10.1193/052312EQS197M Soleimani, F., Liu, X., 2022. Artificial neural network application in predicting probabilistic seismic demands of bridge components. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 51, 612 – 629. Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A.-L., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., Zeileis, A., 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307 Wang, X., Li, Z., Shafieezadeh, A., 2021. Seismic response prediction and variable importance analysis of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges