PSI - Issue 62

Giacomo Viti et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 62 (2024) 65–72 G. Viti et al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

72

8

determined. Moreover, there is an increasing need to validate the software already developed by some software houses to ensure that the logical algorithms implemented by the code are consistent whit those prescribed by the Guidelines and their application instructions, thereby preventing the development of automated schemes that could yield discordant outcomes. The comparative analysis detailed in this paper yielding consistent results among the three analyzed procedures. Certainly, this result is limited to the considered case-study. Conducting this comparison across a broader range of bridges would be beneficial to confirm the reliability of the software and to build up a benchmark database. The comparative analysis also highlights the main pros and cons of each software, where some specific features turned out to be very useful for reducing times and giving robustness to simulations. Future developments could include the integration of Guidelines into AINOP (National Inventory of Public Structures and Infrastructures) or in to interoperable platforms and architectures based on Web Open Gis already successful tested (Dayan, 2022, Santarsiero, 2021, Pessina, 2009) allowing transfer of data and information from the proprietary applications of infrastructure managers for large scale territorial classifications of the existing infrastructure heritage. References ANSFISA (Italian National agency for railways, road and highway infrastructures safety), 2022. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Bridges - Operational instructions (in Italian). Bortot, F., Zonta, D., Zandonini, R., 2006. A bridge management strategy based on future reliability and semi - Markov deterioration models, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International ASRANet Colloquium, Glasgow, UK. pp. 10–12. Buratti, G., Celati, S., Cosentino, A., Gaudioso, D., Mazzatura, I., Morelli, F., Salvatore, W., 2022. The New Guidelines of Italian Ministry of Infrastructures for the Structural Risk Classification of Existing Bridges: Genesis, Examples of Application and Practical Considerations. In: Pellegrino, C., Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Matos, J.C., Casas, J.R., Strauss, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures. EUROSTRUCT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 200. Springer, Cham. CSLLPP (Italian Higher Council of Public Works), 2020. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Bridges, Ministry Decree n. 578/2020 (in Italian). CSLLPP (Italian Higher Council of Public Works), 2022. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Bridges, Ministry Decree n. 204/2022 (in Italian). Cutrone, B., Salvatore, W., Renzi, E., Tamasi, G., 2023. Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, for the evaluation of safety and for the monitoring of existing bridges. Critical analysis and identification of innovative methods to improve the classification of landslide risk. Procedia Structural Integrity 44, 713 - 720. Dayan, V., Chileshe, N., Hassanli, R., 2022. A Scoping Review of Information-Modeling Development in Bridge Management Systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 148, 03122006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002340 De Matteis, G., Bencivenga, P., Zizi, M., 2022. Structural Risk Assessment of Existing Road Bridges According to Italian Guidelines Based on a Territorial Case Study, in: Pellegrino, C., Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Matos, J.C., Casas, J.R., Strauss, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 527–534. Di Sano, S., Costa, G., Giordano, P.F., Pregnolato, M., Limongelli, M.P., 2023. Multi - risk assessment for bridges: the application of the Italian Guidelines. Proceedings in civil engineering, 6(5), 772 - 779. Fattorini, F., Salvatore, W.,Renzi, E., Tamasi, G., 2023. Application to the territorial authorities of the “Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, for the evaluation of safety and for the monitoring of existing bridges”. The case study of the Municipality of Rome. Procedia Structural Integrity 44, 689 - 696. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2022. Hazus Earthquake Model User Guidance MLP (Ministry of Public Works), 1967. Circular n. 6736/61A1 - Control of the stability conditions of roadworks (in Italian). Natali, A., Cosentino, A., Morelli, F., Salvatore, W., 2023. Multilevel Approach for Management of Existing Bridges: Critical Analysis and Application of the Italian Guidelines with the New Operating Instructions. Infrastructures, 8(4), 70. Pessina, V., Meroni, F., 2009. A WebGis tool for seismic hazard scenarios and risk analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 29, 1274 – 1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.03.001 Santarsiero, G., Masi, A., Picciano, V., Digrisolo, A., 2021. The Italian Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management of Bridges: Applications and Remarks on Large Scale Risk Assessments. Infrastructures 6(8), 111. Woodward, R., Cullington, D., Daly, A., Vassie, P., Haardt, P., Kashner, R., Astudillo, R., Velando, C., Godart, B., Cremona, C., 2001. Bridge Management In Europe (BRIME) - Deliverable D14 - Final Report. Yue, Y., Ma, J., Gao, J., Zonta, D., Pozzi, M., 2013. Comparison of Two Approaches in Reliability Analysis for the Network of Trentinos Bridge Management System. Applied Mechanics and Materials 351–352, 1700–1705. Zonta, D., Zandonini, R., Bortot, F., 2007. A reliability - based bridge management concept. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 3, 215–235.