PSI - Issue 62

Erika Garusi et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 62 (2024) 233–240 E. Garusi et al./ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

240

8

Buratti, G., Celati, S., Cosentino, A., Gaudioso, D., Mazzatura, I., Morelli, F., Salvatore, W., 2022. The New Guidelines of Italian Ministry of Infrastructures for the Structural Risk Classification of Existing Bridges: Genesis, Examples of Application and Practical Considerations. In: Pellegrino, C., Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Matos, J.C., Casas, J.R., Strauss, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures. EUROSTRUCT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 200. Springer, Cham. Capogna, M., Salvatore, W.,Renzi, E., Tamasi, G., 2023. “Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, for the evaluation of safety and for the monitoring of existing bridges”. An automatic calculation model of the seismic attention class optimized for the use of cloud computing services. Procedia Structural Integrity 44, 705 - 712. CSLLPP (Italian Higher Council of Public Works), 2020. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Bridges, Ministry Decree n. 578/2020 (in Italian). CSLLPP (Italian Higher Council of Public Works), 2022a. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Bridges, Ministry Decree n. 204/2022 (in Italian). CSLLPP (Italian Higher Council of Public Works), 2022b. Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management, Safety Assessment and Monitoring of Existing Tunnels, Ministry Decree n. 247/2022 (in Italian). Cutrone, B., Salvatore, W., Renzi, E., Tamasi, G., 2023. “Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, for the evaluation of safety and for the monitoring of existing bridges”. Critical analysis and identification of innovative methods to improve the classification of landslide risk. Procedia Structural Integrity, XIX ANIDIS Conference, Seismic Engineering in Italy 44, 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.093 D’Alberti, M., Pajno, A., 2010. Market arbiters. The independent authorities and the economy. Il Mulino (in Italian) De Bartolomeo, D., Renzi, E., Tamasi, G., Palermo, G., Nucci, F.D., 2023. The Italian Risk - Based approach for the development of an Integrated Safety Management System for Road Infrastructures and its Relations with innovative guidelines on the risk management of existing bridges. Transportation Research Procedia, AIIT 3rd International Conference on Transport Infrastructure and Systems (TIS ROMA 2022), 15th - 16th September 2022, Rome, Italy 69, 886–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.249 Elgie, R., 2006. Why Do Governments Delegate Authority to Quasi - Autonomous Agencies? The Case of Independent Administrative Authorities in France. Governance 19, 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468 - 0491.2006.00312.x Fattorini, F., Salvatore, W.,Renzi, E., Tamasi, G., 2023. Application to the territorial authorities of the “Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, for the evaluation of safety and for the monitoring of existing bridges”. The case study of the Municipality of Rome. Procedia Structural Integrity 44, 689 - 696. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2022. Hazus Earthquake Model User Guidance Grimaz, S., Zorzini, F., Malisan, P., Del Pin, E., Zorzini, M., Daneluz, F., De Bartolomeo, D., Conticini, L., Garusi E., Tabelli, G., Renzi, E., & Tamasi, G. , 2024. VISIVIA research project: set-up of the VISIT (Visual Inspection for Safety-deficit Identification and Triage) methodology and application on a prototype case on the road SS13 "Pontebbana". Structural Integrity Procedia, accepted. Longobardi,G., Politi, F., 2009. Market arbiters. Independent administrative authorities and legal - institutional system. Giappichelli (in Italian) Malaga, M., 2022. Does the ‘more appropriate’ authority need to be independent? Rule of law implications for case referrals with respect of concentrations. YARS 15, 109–136. https://doi.org/10.7172/1689 - 9024.YARS.2022.15.25.5 Viti, G., Castriota,I., Renzi. E., Ciminelli. F., Lofrano, E., Bernardini, D., Paolone, A., Tamasi, G., 2024 Guidelines for the classification and management of risk, for the evaluation of safety and for the monitoring of existing bridges: differential analysis of experimental software applications for level 0,1,2 assessments. Structural Integrity Procedia, accepted. Renzi, E., Rossi, A., Tamasi, G., Tabelli, G., Miccinelli, C., Lanzi, A., Vaccariello, M., Trifarò, C.A., 2023. Operating instructions to the guidelines for risk classification and management, safety assessment and monitoring of existing bridges and seismic risk. Procedia Structural Integrity, XIX ANIDIS Conference, Seismic Engineering in Italy 44, 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.096 Trifarò, C., Rossi, A., Tamasi, G., Renzi, E., Zizi, M., De Matteis, G. Sacco, N. , 2024. Statistical analysis of existing bridges inspection results and road network risk management. Structural Integrity Procedia, accepted. Santarsiero, G., Masi, A., Picciano, V., and Digrisolo, A., 2021. The Italian Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management of Bridges: Applications and Remarks on Large Scale Risk Assessments. Infrastructures 6(8), 111. DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures6080111 Yue, Y., Ma, J., Gao, J., Zonta, D., Pozzi, M., 2013. Comparison of Two Approaches in Reliability Analysis for the Network of Trentinos Bridge Management System. Applied Mechanics and Materials 351–352, 1700–1705. Zonta, D., Zandonini, R., Bortot, F., 2007. A reliability - based bridge management concept. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 3, 215–235.