PSI - Issue 62

Andrea Meoni et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 62 (2024) 73–80 Meoni et al/ Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000

77

5

by the Italian Guidelines, such as the construction material of the bridge, its structural typology, maximum length of the spans, traffic level, and more. Figure 5(d) shows the results of the risk evaluation. The case study bridge falls within the high risk level for both Structural-Foundational CoA and Seismic CoA, mainly due to its structural defectiveness (described later in Section 4.2). Consequently, the Overall CoA of the bridge (overall risk condition) is high.

Fig. 4. Main panel of BridgeBIM, a Revit add-in application for informed bridge management.

Fig. 5. Module for risk evaluation: (a) main panel; (b) exemplification of a worksheet collecting defects detected on a structural element of the case study bridge during the performed visual inspection; (c) exemplification of a worksheet collecting information for risk assessment; (d) estimated Class of Attentions (risk levels).