Issue 59

S. Anouar et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 59 (2022) 374-395; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.59.25

2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9

5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7

75.T1 50.T1 25.T1

75.T2 50.T2 25.T2

75.T1 50.T1 25.T1

75.T2 50.T2 25.T2

Displacement Uz (cm)

Displacement Ux (cm)

PP Fiber (%)

0

0.5

1

PP Fiber (%)

0

0.5

1

Figure 21: Uy of model numeric reinforced by CSV.

Figure 19: Ux of model numeric reinforced by CSV.

1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9

75.T1 50.T2

75.T2 25.T1

50.T1 25.T2

0.3

75.T1 50.T2

75.T2 25.T1

50.T1 25.T2

0.25

0.2

0.15

Displacement Uy (cm)

Coefficient of securities Cf

0.1

PP Fiber (%)

PP Fiber (%)

0

0.5

1

0

0.5

1

Figure 22: C f of model numeric reinforced by CSV.

Figure 20: Uy of model numeric reinforced by CSV.

Figure 23: The distribution of displacements (direction X), the soils under embankment without reinforcement.

389