Issue 54
I. Chekalil et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 54 (2020) 153-168; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.54.11
(b)
(a)
130
60
120
50
110
40
100
6.07
6.35
30
90
20
80
Predicted YS [MPa]
Predicted UTS [MPa]
10
70
70 80 90 100 110 120 130
10
20
30
40
50
60
Experimental UTS [MPa]
Experimental YS [MPa]
(c)
100
90
4.74
80
70
Predicted RS [MPa]
60
60
70
80
90
100
Experimental RS [MPa]
Figure 17: Predicted vs Experimental: a) Yield strength b) Ultimate tensile strength c) Rupture strength
N [rot/min]
S [mm/min]
T [°]
UTS [MPa]
YS [MPa]
RS [MPa]
1087,13
399,997
0,7508
116,771
49,9487
83,489
1685,85
200,015
1,3552
122,24
41,8872
91,1325
1694,02
200
1,281
122,59
41,7067
91,047
1900
400
2,0999
122,156 39,5626 86.7125
1423,93
400
1,2885
121,186 55,3134 94,6581
1087,13
399,997
0,7508
116,771 49,9487 83,489
1799,9
200
1,4948
122,716
41,8335
89,989
1600
400
1,5
118,225
42,2038
94,8028
Table 6: Optimal values for the mechanical properties of the welded joint
166
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator