Issue 53
P. Ferro et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 252-284; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.21
The effective thermal conductivity may be defined as [75]:
N 2
1 1 L
k e k g
0.5ln(1 L ) ln(1 L )
1
(22)
where N is the coordination number and L is the ratio of a constant and power particle diameter. The constant value depends on the shielding gas type; for argon, it is equal to 5.4 x 10-4 m-1 while k g is given by the following formula [76]:
0.1125 T
1.33 10 3 T 1.453 10 7 T 1.5
k Ar
(23)
In [77-79] the effective thermal powder conductivity (k e ) is defined as:
1
1
1 1 1
k r k g
k e k g
k s k g
k r k g
2
1
(24)
ln
k g k s
k g k s
1
1
where is the porosity (say, 0.4) and k r is the thermal conductivity which is changed by radiation:
3 D
k r 4F B T
(25)
r
In Eqn. (25) F is the apparent coefficient, usually 1/3, D r is particle diameter and B is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. In order to simulate the transformation from powder to consolidated alloy, the thermal conductivity is changed when the powder reaches its melting temperature (T m ). In [80] the following relations were used:
0.01 k s , T T m k s , T T m
k e
(26)
Ning et al. [81] used a simplified definition for the powder density and thermal conductivity:
e (1 )
(27)
k e (1 )
(28)
where γ and β are coefficients that can be taken as 1 [82]. The latent heat can be taken into account by the equivalent capacity method [80,83]:
C s , T T s C s 2L g (T T s )/(T l T s ) C s 2L v (T T l )/(T v T l )
2 , T 2 , T
C e
s T T l l T T v
(29)
where T l , T s and T v are the liquidus, solidus and vaporization temperatures, respectively, and L g and L v are the latent heat (J/K) of fusion and vaporization. In their work, Xiang et al. [84] distinguished also the emissivity of the powder layer from that of the dense material as follows:
267
Made with FlippingBook Publishing Software