Issue 52
A.V. Tumanov et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 52 (2020) 299-309; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.23
2 T EU a
(4)
f
1
2
N
1
0
where E - Young's modulus. The fatigue damage accumulation rate can be obtained from the equation (3)
1 d dN N N N ln N f f
f
(5)
f
f
F ATIGUE CRACK GROWTH RATE
F
c W can be obtained from true
or Ramberg-Osgood hardening law [26] the critical value of a strain energy density
stress-strain diagram:
p n y
f
y
0
W
d
(6)
c
E E
where - is the strain hardening coefficient, p n - is the strain hardening exponent,
y - is the yield stress,
f - ultimate
tensile stress. According to the classical Hutchinson-Rosengren-Rice model in the zone where fully plastic singularity is dominated the strain energy density W can be found from following expression [14]:
2 y E r
n
2 (1 )
1 p n
n
1
p
W
K
(7)
p
p
e
n
1
p
/ r r a - crack tip distance, a - crack length, e - dimensionless equivalent Mises stresses
where - is Poisson's ratio,
max 1
which depend only on a polar coordinate and normalized by P K in small-scale and extensive yielding conditions in Eqn.(7) can be expressed directly using Rice’s J -integral [15]. That is e . The plastic stress intensity factor
1
p n
1
J E
(8)
K
P
2 I L p y p
where
2 y
r
1 2
P
n
1
n
2
2
1
e
e
d
J
cos
kk
E
n
3
6
1
u
u
u
u
r
r
d
r
r
d
r
cos
sin
(9)
y
rr
y
rr
r
r
In Eqns. (8-9) , i u are crack tip dimensionless displacement components, L is cracked body characteristic size, in our case is the crack length L a , and p I is the numerical constant of the crack-tip stress–strain field, which should be
301
Made with FlippingBook Publishing Software