PSI - Issue 50
D.A. Oshmarin et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 50 (2023) 212–219 Oshmarin D.A., Iurlova N.A., Sevodina N.V. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000
218
7
a
b
Fig. 4. Variants of mechanical loading used for demonstrating possibilities of the proposed approach
Table 2. Options of combination of loading factors. ,0,0, x F F ; var1 U ,0,0, x F F ; var1 I
0, ,0, y F F ; var2 U
0, ,0, y F F ; var2 U
3 1 10
3 1 10
Н ;
Н ;
y F
y F
Н ;
Н ;
3 5 10
3 5 10
x F
x F
I
var1 0 I
var1 0 U
0
0
U
I
var2
var2
3 1 10
3 1 10
Н ;
Н ;
y F
y F
Н ;
Н ;
3 5 10
3 5 10
x F
x F
II
1
7
opt U
var1 1.007 10 opt I
var1 1.895 10
В
А
2
8
opt U
var2 1.618 10 opt I
3.046 10
В
А
var2
3 1 10
3 1 10
Н ;
Н ;
y F
y F
Н ;
Н ;
3 5 10
3 5 10
x F
x F
III
1 var1 1 10
1
1 var1 0.5 10 no I
7
no U
В
А
1
2
1 var2 1 10 no I
8
no U
2 10
В
А
var2
3 1 10
3 1 10
Н ;
Н ;
y F
y F
Н ;
Н ;
3 5 10
3 5 10
x F
x F
IV
2 var1 3 10
1
2 var1 1.5 10 no I
7
no U
В
А
2
2
2
8
no U
no I
4 10
2 10
В
А
var2
var2
a
b
c
d
Fig. 5. FPRs of mechanical response of the system for the following loading cases: (a) force
,0,0, x F F and voltage var1 U ; (b) force 0, ,0, y F F and amperage var2 I .
0, ,0, y F F and voltage var2 U ; (d) force
,0,0, x F F and amperage var1 I ; (c) force
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker