Issue 50
A. Salmi et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 50 (2019) 231-241; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.19
Tab. 3 provides the 2024T3 aluminum alloy chemical compositions [ 4].
Material 2024-T3
Cu
Fe
Si
Cr
Mg Mn Zn Ti
4.82
0.18
0.07
0.02
1.67
0.58
0.06
0.15
Table 3: Chemical composition by mass in percentage.
R ESULTS AND DISCUSSION
P
aris and Erdogan have constructed a quantitative framework of fatigue fracture mechanics, which correlates the fatigue crack growth rate to the range of stress intensity factor as follows [16]:
da C K dN
m
(1)
is the stress intensity factor range in fatigue loading, N
where C and m are empirical material constants, ∆K = K max is number of cycles, and da is crack extension length. The following correlation gives the relation between C and m parameters: - K min
Log C = a + bm
(2)
a and b 0 where: a is the ordinate at the origin and b is the slope of the regression line. Or
m A
C =
(3)
B
da dN
B =10 = k b p
with A =10 = a
p
( da mm k MPa m dN cycle ); ( ) p p
Coordinates of the pivot point [17].
The material constants in Paris equation depicted in Tab. 4 [18]:
Plate thickness 2.29 mm
Plate thickness 6.35 (mm)
m = 3.2828
m = 4.224
C = 3.63 E-13 C = 1.51 E-15 Table 4: Material constants in Paris law for aluminum panel. The total number of stress cycles N required for a short crack to propagate from the initial crack length a 0
to any crack
length a can then be determined as
z
1 i N N
(4)
i
N i stress cycles required for the appearance of the initial crack i = 1; 2; 3; . . . ; z z number of grains transverse by the crack
234
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter