Issue 49
E. Breitbarth et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 49 (2019) 12-25; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.02
subdomains. But this contour leads to discontinuity in the corners of C L in the derivative functions shown in Fig. 4 (c) and (d). Due to the rectangular shape of the domain these discontinuities are unavoidable. This shape was preferred instead of a circular shape as it is more flexible and much more space of the image section could be used. Furthermore, the q-function should not significantly influence the results of the J or interaction integral. and C R
2
h
b
out
y
2
x
i
2
out,R i
q
C
out h h
b
b
R
in
out,R
in,R
2 2
2
h
b
out
y
2
x
i
2
out,L
i
q
C
out h h
b
b
L
in
out,L
in,L
2 2
(7)
h
out y q h h B out 2
i
in
2 2
b
x
out,R i
q
A
b
b
R
out,R in,R
b
x
out,L
i
q
A
b
b
L
out,L in,L
Finally, all values required for solving the J and interaction integral are available (Fig. 1 computation of the interaction integral an auxiliary field is needed (Fig. 1 ⑥ , Auxiliary field As mentioned above, the computation of the interaction integral requires an auxiliary field. All values with the superscript (2) correspond to this field; please see Eqns. (3) and (6). For the determination of K I and K II the first term of the Williams series expansion is utilized. Generally, the Williams field describes the stress field in the vicinity of the crack tip under linear elastic conditions. Here, K I and K II represent the coefficients of the first term. The corresponding stresses and displacements are summarized in Eqn. 8 [26] [26]. The elastic strains can be calculated from the stresses using Hooke’s law (see Eqn. 1). ⑬ ). As mentioned before, for the ⑫ ), as given in the next part (Eq. 8).
2 2 2 11 22 12 2 2 1 2 u u
I
II
f
f f f
11
11
2
2
K
K
I
II
I
II
f f
22
22
2 r
2 r
I
II
12
12
(8)
2
2
I 1 I 2
II
g g
g g
K
r
K
r
1
I
II
2 2
2 2
II
2
17
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs