Issue 48

M. L. Puppio et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 48 (2019) 706-739; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.48.66

Brace type C

Brace type D

Case

V eb,x%

V eb,y%

V eb,x%

V eb,y%

M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

19% 21% 23% 25% 33% 48%

20% 21% 22% 24% 31% 43%

22% 24% 26% 28% 35% 50%

23% 24% 25% 27% 32% 45%

Table A.2. 2: Share at the base - existing structure

Brace type A

Case

Δ 1

[mm]

Δ 2

[mm]

δ MAX

[mm]

M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

1.085 1.379 1.249 1.350 1.772 2.939

1.080 1.450 1.392 1.597 2.231 3.447

2.132 2.829 2.641 2.947 4.003 6.386

Table A.2. 3: Displacements – Linear Analysis

Brace type B

Case

Δ 1

[mm]

Δ 2

[mm]

δ MAX

[mm]

M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

1.105 1.183 1.268 1.373 1.799 2.960

1.182 1.331 1.481 1.678 2.295 3.489

2.253 2.514 2.749 3.051 4.094 6.449

Table A.2. 4: Displacements – Linear Analysis

Brace type C

Case

Δ 1

[mm]

Δ 2

[mm]

δ MAX

[mm]

M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5

1.321 1.413 1.498 1.602 2.001 3.089

1.464 1.600 1.737 1.918 2.496 3.624

2.775 3.013 3.235 3.520 4.497 6.713

Table A.2. 5: Displacements – Linear Analysis

736

Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter