Issue 48
M. L. Puppio et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 48 (2019) 706-739; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.48.66
Brace type C
Brace type D
Case
V eb,x%
V eb,y%
V eb,x%
V eb,y%
M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
19% 21% 23% 25% 33% 48%
20% 21% 22% 24% 31% 43%
22% 24% 26% 28% 35% 50%
23% 24% 25% 27% 32% 45%
Table A.2. 2: Share at the base - existing structure
Brace type A
Case
Δ 1
[mm]
Δ 2
[mm]
δ MAX
[mm]
M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
1.085 1.379 1.249 1.350 1.772 2.939
1.080 1.450 1.392 1.597 2.231 3.447
2.132 2.829 2.641 2.947 4.003 6.386
Table A.2. 3: Displacements – Linear Analysis
Brace type B
Case
Δ 1
[mm]
Δ 2
[mm]
δ MAX
[mm]
M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
1.105 1.183 1.268 1.373 1.799 2.960
1.182 1.331 1.481 1.678 2.295 3.489
2.253 2.514 2.749 3.051 4.094 6.449
Table A.2. 4: Displacements – Linear Analysis
Brace type C
Case
Δ 1
[mm]
Δ 2
[mm]
δ MAX
[mm]
M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
1.321 1.413 1.498 1.602 2.001 3.089
1.464 1.600 1.737 1.918 2.496 3.624
2.775 3.013 3.235 3.520 4.497 6.713
Table A.2. 5: Displacements – Linear Analysis
736
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter