PSI - Issue 47

11

Abdullah Al-Ibrahim et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 47 (2023) 426–436 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000

436

abrasive wear with less observation of adhesive wear and delamination. However, when ROP is applied with 1000N contact load the wear volume of P110 is the least, and L80, SM2535-110 will be close. For all grades, two abrasive wear circumferential due to rotation and axial under combined sliding and rotational can be found . 5. conclusion Three different casing grades (P110-L80- SM2535-110) have been tested under two contact loads (1000N 1400N) and analyzed the effect of applying ROP of 2.5mm/s on wear volume and wear mechanisms. The following has been found:  Under combined sliding and rotational, the wear volume will result in a significant increase, and the presence of adhesive and delamination wear mechanisms will decrease.  The dominant wear mechanism is abrasive wear for all samples, and under 1000N contact load and combined rotational and sliding, circumferential, and axial abrasive wear will appear.  wear volume will decrease when the contact load decreases to 1000N, and the presence of adhesive and delamination wear mechanisms will decrease.  P110 has the highest wear resister compared to L80 and SM2535-110, and it has not shown delamination wear in the four samples.  Under combined sliding and rotational, L80 and SM2535-110 will have almost the same wear volume . Acknowledgements: The support of KFUPM is gratefully acknowledged by the author. The casings, drilling pipes, and drilling fluids were supplied by the Drilling Department in Saudi Aramco. References Best, B. (1986). Casing wear caused by Tooljoint hardfacing. SPE Drilling Engineering , 1 (01), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.2118/11992-pa Chu, S., Zhang, L., Fan, J., Zheng, W., & Yu, H. (2009). Experimental study of casing wear under impact-sliding conditions. Petroleum Science , 6 (4), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-009-0068-y Gao, D., Sun, L., & Lian, J. (2010). Prediction of casing wear in extended-reach drilling. Petroleum Science , 7 (4), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-001-0098-6 Huimei, W., & Yishan, L. (2012). The influence of drilling parameters on casing wear in Ultra-Deep directional well. ICPTT 2012 . https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412619.095 JEOL JSM-6610 scanning electron microscope . UCLA Nanolab. (n.d.). Retrieved December 30, 2022, from https://nanolab.ucla.edu/project/jeol-jsm-6610-scanning-electron-microscope/ Jin, C., Qian, F., & Feng, F. (2020). Effect of variable drill pipe sizes on casing wear collapse strength. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering , 195 , 107856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107856 Kumar, A., & Samuel, R. (2015). Casing wear factors: How do they improve well integrity analyses? Day 3 Thu, March 19, 2015 . https://doi.org/10.2118/173053-ms Lian, Z., Zhang, Q., Lin, T., Li, K., & Liu, Y. (2016). Experimental study and prediction model of casing wear in oil and Gas Wells. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology , 138 (3). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032473 Mao, L., Cai, M., & Wang, G. (2018). Effect of rotation speed on the abrasive–erosive–corrosive wear of steel pipes against steel casings used in drilling for petroleum. Wear , 410-411 , 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2018.06.002 Tbb Global Technology Co., L. (n.d.). DSX510 . TBB Global Vi ệ t Nam. Retrieved December 30, 2022, from https://tbbglobal.com/san pham/dsx510-238.html White, J. P., & Dawson, R. (1987). Casing wear: Laboratory measurements and field predictions. SPE Drilling Engineering , 2 (01), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.2118/14325-pa Yu, H., Taleghani, A. D., & Lian, Z. (2018). Modelling casing wear at doglegs by incorporating alternate accumulative wear. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering , 168 , 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.05.009 Zhang, Q., Lian, Z., Lin, T., Deng, Z., Xu, D., & Gan, Q. (2016). Casing wear analysis helps verify the feasibility of gas drilling in Directional Wells. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering , 35 , 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.066