Issue 47
L. Marsavina et al., Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 47 (2019) 266-276; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.47.20
h subset
subset
x 1
1
v subset
m
D v
x 1
ZOI
D h
x 2
m*
Undeformed image
x 1
ZOI
Deformed image
x 2
Subset m (4x4pixels) Subset center
x 2 pixel
x 2 subset
x 1
pixel
ZOI
x 1 Subsets subset
pixel
x 2
Sample with Black and white speckle pattern
Figure 6 : Principle of DIC
Evaluation of crack relative displacement factor As detailed in works of [19, 20, 25, 52], the CRDF is calculated from the experimental displacement field via an adjustment procedure based on an iterative Newton-Raphson algorithm (see Fig. 7).
Optimization Experimental boundary conditions experimental noises
Analytical solutions of Kolossov–Muskhelishvili’s series
Optimized fields
N 1 N 1
f ,
g ,
/2
/2
u
1 A r
2 A r
1
Experimental displacement field
Equivalent displacement field
z ,
/2
/2
u
1 A r
l
,
2 A r
2
By an adjustment procedure Optimization of displacement field
Adjustment procedure ( Newton-Raphson)
Identification of the weighting coefficients
1 A A A A T T R x x N N 0
1 1
0 2
2
1
2
1
2
1
0
Rigid body motions
Crack geometry
( ) 1 K 2 2 A 1 ( ) 1 2 2 K 2 2 A 1 1 1
Crack Relative Displacement Factor
Figure 7 : Methodology of CRDF calculation.
This consists in a fitting of analytical solutions of Kolossov–Muskhelishvili’s series [53, 54] on the displacement fields measured by DIC. Dubois et al. [16, 17], Pop et al. [19] and Meite et al. [20] show that by using this approach, an “equivalent” displacement field can be created without experiment noises, the knowledge of the material properties or the nonlinear phenomena presence [17-20]. Then, the CRDF can be expressed as a function to the weighting coefficients of the analytical solutions of Kolossov–Muskhelishvili’s series.
272
Made with FlippingBook Publishing Software