Issue 46
V. Rizov, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 46 (2018) 158-177; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.46.16
g
B
g
(26)
i
r r 
i
i
g
1
D
r
r
i
i
i
1
where
i i r r r   
(27)
1
r and
1 i r  , are shown in Fig. 2. In (25) and (26), i B f , i D f , i B g and i D
g are material properties (
D f and
The radiuses, i
i
i g , respectively). The distribution of shear strains in radial direction is written as D f govern the gradient of i f and i
r
(28)
m
r
b
By substituting of (24), (25), (26) and (28) in (23), one derives
1  i n 
 
2
1 4
1 5
  
  
4
4   r
5
i 
T
r
r
r
5
(29)
m i
i
i
i
i
1
1
r
i
1
b
where
1
i 
(30)
i 
f
g
B i
B m
i 
(31)
i
i
 2
D i g r
 
  
2
i 
i i r
1
2
r
1
i
i b
i 
f
D  i
i 
(32)
i
f
B
i 
(33)
i
i i r
1
0 B g  and
0 D f  Eqn. (29) transforms in
It should be mentioned that at
i
i
1  i n 
 
1
4
4
T
r
r
(34)
m
i
i
1
r
f
2
i
1
b
B
i
The fact that (34) is exact match of the equation for equilibrium of a multilayered circular shaft made by linear-elastic homogeneous layers loaded in torsion [14] is an indication for consistency of (34) since at 0 i B g  and 0 i D f  the non linear stress-strain relation (24) transforms in the Hooke’s law assuming that 1/ i B f is the shear modulus in the i -th layer. Eqn. (29) should be solved with respect to m  by using the MatLab computer program. Eqn. (29) is used also to determine the shear strain at the periphery of the cross-section of the un-cracked shaft portion. For this purpose, 1 n , b r and m  are replaced, respectively, with n , R and q  in (29) and (31).
164
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter