Issue 41

V. Rizov, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 491-503; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.61

   

   

m

m

m

2

B b

1 

B b

2 B br

m

m

1

1

0 1

1 1

1 

2   

N

1

2

1 3 1 

m

m h m

1

z

m

  

  

B br

2

1

n

1

m

m

m

m

2

2

1

1

2 1

1

(18)

1 

2 

1 

2 

2

m

m

2

1

h

    

f

q

f

q

f

q

f

q

3

3

2

2

   

   

   

   

z

2 1 B b q  m

2

1

n

1

q

q

q

q

1

1 

2 

1 

2 

2

f

q

f

q

3

2

h

f q 

f q 

      

 

2 1 1 n z f q 

  

q

q

1 

2 

 

m

m

2

      

1 1 

1 

B b

2 B br

1

m

m

m

2

2

1 

2   

M B b  

y

0 1

2

1

2 m h

3

    

f

q

f

q

3

3

   

   

z

m

  

2 1 B br q 

2

1

n

1

q

q

m

m

1

1

1

1 

2 

1 

2 

2

m

f

q

1

3

h

f q 

f q 

f

q

f

q

2

2

   

   

   

 

2

z

z

2

n

n

  

1

1

q

q

q

q

1

1

1 

2 

1 

2 



(19)

f q 

f

q

2

    

f

q

f

q

f

q

f

q

4

4

3

3

   

   

   

   

z

2 1 B b q  m

3

1

n

1

q

q

q

q

1

1 

2 

1 

2 

2

f

q

f

q

4

3

h

f q 

f q 

f

q

f

q

2

2

   

   

   

 

2

3

z

z

3

n

n

  

1

1

q

q

q

q

1

1

1 

2 

1 

2 

 

f q 

f

q

2

/ 2   

/ 2     h

/ f q m  ( f and q are positive integers). In (19), 1 N and 1 y M are

where 1 1 h

z

z

, 2

and

1 1 n

1 1 n

1

determined by (15). It is obvious that at m =1 the non-linear stress-strain relation (1) transforms into the Hooke’s law, assuming that B = E (here E is the modulus of elasticity). This means that at m =1 Eq. (19) should transform into the formula for curvature of linear-elastic beam. Indeed, at m =1, 0 B E  and 1 2 0 B B   Eq. (19) yields

M Ebh

12

y

1

(20)

1  

3

1

which is exact match of the formula for curvature of a linear-elastic homogeneous beam of width, b , and height, 1 h . Eqs. (18), and (19) should be solved with respect to 1 1 n z and 1  by using the MatLab computer program. By substituting of (12) and (16) in (11) the distribution of complementary strain energy density in the lower crack arm is written as

 1

  

m m

1

2

   

   

m z z 

2

r z 

y

4

n

1 1

1

1

1

* 0

1

B  

u

B

B

(21)

L

0

1

2

2

2

m

1

b

h

496

Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator