Issue 38
T. Morishita et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 38 (2016) 289-295; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.38.39
Δε p eq N f ; the thin line shows the relationship of Δε p eq N f
to be BN f 0.6 /(1+α f NP
assuming Δε p eq
). The relationships of
Δε p eq N f are drawn by separate lines in the proportional loading and the non-proportional loading. This results show that the elastic deformation behaviour may be independent on the non-proportional loading becomes of the smaller chance of interaction of slip systems due to non-proportional loading [2;3;6;12]. In order to estimate the effect of non-proportional loading in the lower stress/strain level; the modified equation is presented as
.
BN
f
12.0
AN
(5)
eq
f
+ 1 f
NP
Fig. 7 shows comparison between N f eva * and N f exp . N f eva * is evaluated by the modified non-proportional strain range defined in Eq. (5). In Fig. 7; almost of the data are replotted within the factor of 2 band and the correlation becomes better in comparison with that in Fig. 5 (b). Therefore the modified non-proportional strain range becomes a suitable parameter for life evaluation in the high and the low strain levels under non-proportional loading. However; the definition of α still needs more discussion with additional experimental results in future studies.
2
0.5 1
p eq
6.0
BN
f
0.01 Strain range e eq , p eq , % 0.05 0.1
e eq
12.0
AN
f
Push-pull (Elastic strain) Push-pull (Plastic strain) Rev. torsion (Elastic strain) Rev. torsion (Plastic strain) Circle (Elastic strain) Circle (Plastic strain)
6.0
BN
p eq
f
1
f
NP
10 2
10 3
10 4
10 5
10 6
10 7
Number of cycles to failure N f
, cycles
Figure 6: Correlations of N f
by Δε e eq
and Δε p eq .
10 7
Push-pull Rev.torsion Circle
10 3 Failure life in evaluation N f eva* , cycles Factor of 2 10 4 10 5 10 6
* eva
exp f N N
f
10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 2
exp , cycles
Failure life in experiment N f
Figure 7: Comparison of N f eva * and N f exp .
294
Made with FlippingBook Publishing Software