Issue 33
T. Itoh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 33 (2015) 289-301; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.33.33
loading stages of AA’, BB’ and CC’, Fig. 4 (d). Finally, the straight loading lines are obtained in the polar figure as shown in Fig. 4 (e). In the proportional loadings in Fig. 4 (a), the directions of I ( t ) are fixed ( =0 or 180 ) and =0 . The maximum strain range and mean strain are expressed as
I
I
I
1
( ) ( ') k k
(8)
max
min
3
1 2
1 ( )
Imean (9) as shown in Fig. 4 (e), where k takes A, B or C and k ’ A’, B’ and C’. The results agree well with the principal strain range and mean strain we have considered by putting a sign with human operation. I I max min 1 3 ( ') 2 k k
( t ), 3
( t )
1
3
A
C
max
A’ B’ C’
B
I
1
1
I max
B C
O t
O
A
B
A’
O A
O
C
3
B’
min
C’
S I mean
I
(a) (b)
I
3
O
( t )
I
( t )/2, ( t )
C’
A
B’
A’
A’ B’ C’
( t )/2
I min
90
B C
( t )
t
t
(e)
O O
O O
O
O
(c) (d)
Figure 4 : Variations of i
(t), I ( t ) and ( t )/2 in proportional straining: (a) Strain paths on / 3 plot, (b) Variation of i ( t ), (c)
Variation of I
( t ), (d) Variation of ( t ) and ( t ), (e) Strain paths on polar figure.
Non-proportional Loading Fig. 5 shows non-proportional loading cases of the cruciform and box shapes. In the figure, Imax
is assumed to be given
by I (A) and I (a) in the cruciform and box shape loadings, respectively. The principal strains and the direction of I ( t ) in each stage in the figure are expressed as follows. Principal strains: Stage OA, OB, OD and DdAaB 2 1 2 2 ( ) 1 1 1 t
I I 2
3
( ) ( ) t t
( ) t
2 2
(10.a)
1
1 t for cruciform loading for box shaped loading 3 ( ) t ( )
( ) t
Since of
A A a a 1 ( ) ( )
I ( ) ( ) I
max
I
max
1
Stage OC and BbCcD
1
( ) ( ) t t
1
1 1
2
2
2
2
3
( ) ( ) t t
2 2
(10.b)
I
3
1
3
( ) t
Since of
( ) t
( ) t
293
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online